Rams said:
Because you're a hypocrite? And going around shooting the police is even nutter.
Quote what I said that was hypocritical and I'll try to correct it.
As mentioned, I believe what the police have done qualifies them as combatants, they are shooting people in the head with rubber rounds and gas canisters. Not throwing them on the ground, not shooting in extremities, in the head. They are killing people.
Engaging combatants is legitimate.
They haven't done that yet, we can't just take assumptions. That would be like shooting a man in a fight because he might have pulled a knife on you.
Sure, but when they do, I hope people understand the danger they're in.
You're right, I'm sure the tweets and facebook statuses really help the protesters withstand rubber bullets in the temple.
Obviously the government cares how they are internationally viewed.
Obviously, it doesn't. That's kind of what this is all about.
Seriously, the worse the government is going to act, the more support the protesters are going to get, that's including from within Trukey.
How many civilians have to die aimlessly to get external support? If Operation Desert Storm is anything to go by,
quite a ****ing few.
Kobrag said:
If you can even remember, there was a destabilised government-less region that was perfect for the formation and cementation of several religious extremist organisations.
Can you elaborate rather than roll your eyes, adding nothing to the conversation? Both on your point and the case in point.