[parsehtml]<p><img class="frame" src="https://www.taleworlds.com/Images/News/blog_post_94_taleworldswebsite.jpg" alt="" width="575" height="290" /></p>
<p>During battles, hierarchies are of key importance: keeping the chain of command intact and knowing exactly who is in charge is vital… especially if that someone is you! That rang especially true in medieval times when the chain of command was also a reflection of how society was ordered as a whole.</p></br> [/parsehtml]Read more at: http://www.taleworlds.com/en/Games/Bannerlord/Blog/114
Dev Blog 13/06/19
- Thread starter Callum
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
Davic said:
That should indeed be the case. Also, allied lords within range might still join a fight, so there could still be battles like in Warband where each lord commands his own party, when they are not formally organized into an army.
Dave_R
Recruit
I wonder if this System is connected to the reinforcement mechanics. In other words: do all the lords in an Army have to start on the battlefield. Personally i think it would be cool to asign a lord or maybe even the Player to command the reinforcements.
If reinforcements are handled like in warband that would mean that every „command Group“ will only be reinforced by a few soldiers, right?
I think there has been some info about reinforcements (a blog?) in the past. So maybe my questions have been answered before.
If reinforcements are handled like in warband that would mean that every „command Group“ will only be reinforced by a few soldiers, right?
I think there has been some info about reinforcements (a blog?) in the past. So maybe my questions have been answered before.
I look forward to commanding the Battania assault troops with my berserker character (I hope the assault troops like the ulfhednar are separated from the rest of the "infantry" formation as are the archers) I was hoping they would implement a feature like this, as I am happy with the feature of the executions. Thanks 
ps:
1 Can a lord who disobeys orders be executed in certain cases?
2 Does the player who disobeys orders risk the death penalty?
3 If the player is a commander or a king can execute a lord who disobeys orders?
ps:
1 Can a lord who disobeys orders be executed in certain cases?
2 Does the player who disobeys orders risk the death penalty?
3 If the player is a commander or a king can execute a lord who disobeys orders?
BIGGER Kentucky James XXL said:
1. is not a problem (its quite realistic, the disincentive is, you lose the battle or find it harder, get a lower command pick etc)
2.Yes in the commander mode? if you are the main commander you can order all those below you, that is why they are grouped, nothing changes, however its more realistic now
3. I doubts its relevance in sieges , but sure why not?
jujumoooyee said:
I sense them going the SHENMUE 3 route, would be likely old fashioned when released, as it doesn't look like its even coming out next year, anyways waiting it has become fun in itself
jujumoooyee said:
Have to admit Mordhau does have really satisfying combat. Also really like how their bots actually duck and some times akinda backwards evasive spin around move. That kind of variety is important to keep fighting interesting after the long grindout of a campaign. But Mordhau will never have the whole world sandbox campaign thing going for it so safe to say -2 different genres.
liznaviecki
Recruit
What about friends, whose I gather during traveling? Will they stay with me in a batllefield?
What if I won't be a lord but a mercenary hired together with my band for a batlle? Will I lead my mercenaries toward enemy?
What if I won't be a lord but a mercenary hired together with my band for a batlle? Will I lead my mercenaries toward enemy?
I'm sure it's been suggested already, but please give us great control over troop assignments. We need it!
Allowing us to create groups and then assign individual soldiers to those groups would be a huge boon for veteran strategists and tacticians. Forming groups, then assigning them to commanders... Oh, now we're talking.
I'm thinking, create two squadrons of cavalry, assign them to aggressive commanders and task them with flank guard. Handpicked units so that both commanders have a mixture of veterans and recruits.
In the top-down view, this would allow us to create groups of mixed skill of archers, spears, sword, cavalry, etc. Then further assign these groups to different commanders.
As well as, reassignment of troops on the fly. A group of cavalry under the command of Baron Joe, may further be placed under command of Count Phillip and his swordsmen, as the battle progresses. While King Dave rampages with a section of cavalry. At any time, King Dave may break off from his sporting with the horses to come and personally lead the rabble of Swordsmen to victory.
That's my two cents.
Allowing us to create groups and then assign individual soldiers to those groups would be a huge boon for veteran strategists and tacticians. Forming groups, then assigning them to commanders... Oh, now we're talking.
I'm thinking, create two squadrons of cavalry, assign them to aggressive commanders and task them with flank guard. Handpicked units so that both commanders have a mixture of veterans and recruits.
In the top-down view, this would allow us to create groups of mixed skill of archers, spears, sword, cavalry, etc. Then further assign these groups to different commanders.
As well as, reassignment of troops on the fly. A group of cavalry under the command of Baron Joe, may further be placed under command of Count Phillip and his swordsmen, as the battle progresses. While King Dave rampages with a section of cavalry. At any time, King Dave may break off from his sporting with the horses to come and personally lead the rabble of Swordsmen to victory.
That's my two cents.
cherac said:
Maybe waiting itself is one of the game feature
Ok, it seems as if we won't get answers to these questions here. I get it, theres a lot of questions, Callum is busy full steam ahead at TW, but they are simple yes/no or one-sentence questions many of them. I hope at least you guys at TW are taking notes, so that you may answer these with your gameplay demonstration at Gamescom. This goes for many of the little unanswered questions that come up from every blog.
vicwiz007 said:
It doesn't matter very much. It's nice to know the fine details of such and such a feature, but it doesn't actually let you play with them any sooner.
If everything's explained fully, there's no room for speculation, and it won't generate so much forum discussion. That's why the blogs are always a bit vague.
[SOTR] Roy said:
I respect your opinion mate, however I can not understand how a detailed explanation of a mechanic which is part of a sandbox game and not a story driven game can ruin/spoil your playable experience.
Yeah I don't need to know detailed quest chains or stuff like that, but there are definitely times where the blogs have raised more questions than answers, which is disappointing. I realize that understanding these features better won't let me play any earlier, but I can get a clearer idea of how the game is going to be when I do get to play it.
Sirra
Recruit
Hello everyone!
i have an idea . What do you think about adding a possibility to fight with two knives or two daggers at once? i think it's very wonderful idea. it may diversify the gameplay and it would be interesting at all.and also in my opinion it would be logic if you add an attractiveness scale for character which will have an influence on his relationship with ladies for example.
thank you for attention!
He was replying to the other users' posts, not yours.Sirra said:i just mean that this ideas are interesting, not very important but as all. it's pretty cool to have a choice choosing your fight style. sorry if you don't understand me, it's language barrier's fault and my English level
Terco_Viejo said:
I don't see what "playing with them any sooner" has to do with this. I'm really tired of that excuse of leaving the blogs barebones so that they don't spoil anything, or we can speculate. See Terco's reason above^Rabies said:
What benefit will we truly have from waiting til playing to learn whether or not (for example) we create the formations ourselves when commander? Maybe two seconds of thinking "hm that's cool", but even then most people will not even think it's special. Just another feature to the game. So why are details like these not shared? If you say "it doesn't matter whether we learn these details or not" then it must be true that the best option is to take two seconds to share these details and appease fans who want to know. Same with blogs, if you don't want the features "spoiled" don't read the blogs.
