Thats just question, i wanted to see his respond, and one more thing thats hidden..
Now, probably, we ll see purchasable dlcs, and i only said that its ok if they all cheap. And also said better option is creating "supporter dlcs" & dont sellin any other cosmetics as dlc. So, Dlcs are Ok, they can be non-free. But, framework is important. Ill keep talking about my reasonable expectations to give useful feedback. Therefore i can be part of smart offers. Relax budy
(being opposite all without thinkin is not a good behavior)
Btw, i have master system suggestion in my separete threads.. That system also gives chance to buy skins for mastery equipments. Thats another good thing. Player can customize it further, and developer or creator of skin can earn what well-deserved.. Purchaseable skins are not bad things.Nor for devs, nor for players. Just check quality & framework.
Being oppositer, is bad.
Now, probably, we ll see purchasable dlcs, and i only said that its ok if they all cheap. And also said better option is creating "supporter dlcs" & dont sellin any other cosmetics as dlc. So, Dlcs are Ok, they can be non-free. But, framework is important. Ill keep talking about my reasonable expectations to give useful feedback. Therefore i can be part of smart offers. Relax budy
(being opposite all without thinkin is not a good behavior)
Btw, i have master system suggestion in my separete threads.. That system also gives chance to buy skins for mastery equipments. Thats another good thing. Player can customize it further, and developer or creator of skin can earn what well-deserved.. Purchaseable skins are not bad things.Nor for devs, nor for players. Just check quality & framework.
Being oppositer, is bad.
Last edited: