Nope. They don't give estimates. If you look at the bug reports on the tech forum you can eye ball how many issues need to be worked on, however they can and do push version with minor bugs to the stable version.
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Beta Patch Notes v1.1.0
- Thread starter Callum
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
Underuse2307
Regular
might want to take a zanax before you do..
Call it what you like. We all can see what it is.
No matter what they say its EA 1000%. The game is much worse since 1.8 dropped and console its the meaning of EA. If you go a couple pages back you can see the 5 or 6 major issues with 1.1.0. That was not the norm before 1.8. There is virtually no communication with the community. This is one of the best games runs by one of the worst companies. It's sad to say and I might take flack for it but I actually have videos dating back 2 years covering only the beta branch so I have proof showing how things weren't as bad until 1.8 hit. So I could make a video showing how bad things have been with the game and with the communication from TW. I wish another company could make a game like Bannerlord so we could get a company that actually shows they care about the community. I am watching a few other games recently over the last 2 years and the communication with the community is amazing. I am just shocked you can release a game and act like you don't even care about your community. If I ran a company I would be all over raising awareness, hype and building a relationship with your community, I wouldn't ignore, keep quiet and give almost no updates and release sub standard branches( meaning much worse than ones in EA) Just look at the steam numbers, if I ran TW I would be concerned how bad the player base has dropped. It's so confusing, you want to make money but you don't put the work into PR or hype. I dare a TW rep (not a dev) to questions me on this. The suits at TW need to learn how to handle a game and a community. I would be ashamed if I ran my channel like this and lose so many people. But, I actually care about my community and I am passionate about what I do.......Tw....Are you?
Has anyone seen an overflow problem? I had almost 100 relations with Caladog and then helped him in a siege. All of a sudden a huge negative number flashed by and I had -100 relation with him and everyone in his clan. This is really screwing my plans to marry into his clan, lol.
TW surely has it´s issues, but a dropping player base in a singleplayer game isn´t really unseen. That´s actually normal. If you want a constant playerbase you need something like a live service game. And I am not sure if you want to go down that rabbit hole.
Gadheras
Sergeant
Yeah, screw that. Live service with cash shops, loot boxes and similar is cancer to the gamers. All about milk the players for as much as possible. Consider BL been out quite a while on early access before release you can't really expect player count to remain way up there forever. With single player games, players consume the content until a new game catch their fancy. But it wont keep players from get back to it and play it more later. Since I bought BL short after early access I probably bought another 10-15 games, but I keep come back and play BL: The end game is lacking, the campaign is really tedious but still the game do offer replayability.
Great love Immortal
Veteran
I do not have that problem with relation, but every now and again whenever I try to raise my army cohesion I have to pay around -12309452#, there is a real problem with that.
yes a known bug, part of the major issues I listed that needs fixing. Assisting or releasing lords after battle has a chance to get you -10000000 relation, and I not exaggerating that number. TW needs to step it up. The beta branch is a mess and I would love to play it and sure console people would too. guess we just wait another month for fixes
The only saving grace here for them with the long EA and as single-player game is that it is a sandbox and highly moddable (gameplay elements). As they tend to offer a lot of replayability and new playthroughs with each patch/fix that most other single-player games can't really. Games like Witcher/Cyberpunk/KCD generally have a limited playthrough that's story-driven; most people play it through once or twice if even, then that's it - maybe revisiting with a DLC or something but that's the curse of single-player games.
From the experience with my channel, most people stick around for around 1 month and drift away. That is the problem when you make something so "vanilla" It's either introduce some great mechanics to make the replayability better or release updated and/or DCL constantly or you will continue to drop in steam. There are games 5-10 years old that do way better than Bannerlord which is crazy since Bannerlord is so unique. It's just not executed or cared by the company to really put love into it
Gadheras
Sergeant
I can only speak for myself. When I get a game I tend to focus on it until I complete it, then I move on to another. Then some day later I revisit and do another stint. Depending on type of game though. Things like civ, crusader kings, rimworld etc got far more replayability than things like witcher, cyberpunk and similar.There is a whole lot of games that does much worse than Bannerlord too. There is no standard benchmark we can measure up a game against because everyone have their own taste. My friend consider EU4 is the best thing ever. I spent less than a hour and hated it.
