you're free to code something better than this instead of crying all the time
HKP said:you're free to code something better than this instead of crying all the time
Apollo~ said:This is why we can't have anything nice kids.
Freyja said:Here is what I did not understand; are you saying that we have to use it ? or only the ppl who asked you to must use that ? like in here "The MOSS shall be used by randomly chosen people and people accused of cheating."
Hero_of_Ferelden said:Freyja said:Here is what I did not understand; are you saying that we have to use it ? or only the ppl who asked you to must use that ? like in here "The MOSS shall be used by randomly chosen people and people accused of cheating."
I've no idea if this will be the case, but I'd expect atleast 1 player from every team will have to use MOSS.
But even in the forums, there is lots of complaints. Ciiges already said that, but the only thing that makes sense is that the suspects use it. I don't think anybody will oppose this.MaHuD said:It would only make sense to use MOSS, if every player has to use it for all official matches that are in a tournament that demands MOSS.
Paulo said:idea: At every match, team can have for exemple 3 jokers, that's mean they can ask 3 people in the opposite team to use MOSS
It's protection in the sense of 'it's less likely the person would share it', rather then protection itself. It won't be a blame game if only 1 or 2 people have access to the screenshot, although I guess there's always the possibility of someone sharing their own screenshot.Fietta said:Everything you said was fantastic, however, this doesn't protect information, this just turns it into a blame game. I really like your picks for reviewers though, I agree completely.
Pepper said:1. Don't have 3/4 of the people reviewing the info in the same team/clan/friendship group. I've obviously nothing against AE and they step up a lot for tournaments etc, but I don't think when handling stuff like this you should have all of them being good friends. I'm sure they wouldn't share personal info etc but the possibility is there when they're such a tight nit group. Of course this goes for anyone in a similar position.
Pepper said:2. The people reviewing it don't have the be the guys who always host tournaments. I understand these are the people who are usually those who step up and know a lot about warband, but for instance while I love OGL I don't think he's a good choice when half the community don't like him much (lmao) as regardless of his asset it doesn't inspire trust. I think you'll need a selection of people from around the community who are trusted not to gossip, well-liked and from seperate areas. I don't really know how you'd go about this, but people such as Rome, ChatNoir, Volcom, Oliveran or Erminas would be -my- picks, people who have done things in the community but are also not in the same friendship circle as well as being trusted enough. Of course, those would be my options but it's likely different for others, so I don't know how you'd go about it and I've no idea who's even interested in doing it including the people I mentioned.