I recorded a match with the intention of showing how easy it is to join, but I failed in actually capturing my desktop at the start. Regardless it ended up a good match. Bonus me being confused 2nd set failing to pick up a shield.
beautiful video (of course not...)OurGloriousLeader said:I recorded a match with the intention of showing how easy it is to join, but I failed in actually capturing my desktop at the start. Regardless it ended up a good match. Bonus me being confused 2nd set failing to pick up a shield.
Cool video. You should actually make a video showing how easy it is to join.OurGloriousLeader said:I recorded a match with the intention of showing how easy it is to join, but I failed in actually capturing my desktop at the start. Regardless it ended up a good match. Bonus me being confused 2nd set failing to pick up a shield.
OurGloriousLeader said:I recorded a match with the intention of showing how easy it is to join, but I failed in actually capturing my desktop at the start. Regardless it ended up a good match. Bonus me being confused 2nd set failing to pick up a shield.
OurGloriousLeader said:I think you should limit the archer class to two per team. Currently archers are having a disproportionate impact on games because people are uncoordinated and the counter otherwise is cav, and there's not that many good cav playing and if they are playing they don't have much to work with pushing alone into 3 archers.
I don't think this would be too "artificial" in affecting the meta because we know from playing warband a lot in scrims that 3 or 4 archers isn't usually a winning set up. It would also make the class selection at the start a bit more important as if you end up in a team with a lot of rangers then you actually need to discuss who is getting it.
OurGloriousLeader said:I think you should limit the archer class to two per team. Currently archers are having a disproportionate impact on games because people are uncoordinated and the counter otherwise is cav, and there's not that many good cav playing and if they are playing they don't have much to work with pushing alone into 3 archers.
I don't think this would be too "artificial" in affecting the meta because we know from playing warband a lot in scrims that 3 or 4 archers isn't usually a winning set up. It would also make the class selection at the start a bit more important as if you end up in a team with a lot of rangers then you actually need to discuss who is getting it.
Charlini said:There was an attempt of forcing ppl to play on selected class, and it was horrible, the only thing it makes it viable is if they allow to just change class between sets otherwise, in case you would get a logical setup(which is unlikely to happen), you would have like 3 archers who were vaegir playing archer aswell on nords, unnable to change class, which would result in ****shows and bad games.
True, it should be 3 archers.Alyss said:2 archers only? Vaegirs can be played as 3 archers and sarranids too