TheGreatGold
Sergeant at Arms
IGN isn't that suicidal to give Bannerlord a 5/10, altough they gave warband a 6/10 (console version).NoobMan4321 said:Polycount is right bout developing the game. Better wait while giving reasonable suggestions.
But If I'm new to this game and quick to judge, honestly I would say that this game would score 5/10 on game review if they intend to release the game official this year with so many things that hasn't been developed or purposely did so out of haste. I hope that won't happen.
currently theres alot of competition and I'm worried of youtubers that will compare Mount and blade Bannerlord with other games in terms of Gameplay, graphics, mechanics, and over all score with their bias view.
It's rare to find a youtuber that are neutral and not bias. But guess you can't blame them much as this is how they promote and introduce games to players that are looking for something to spend their money.
I see no problem mixing the experience and the beginners together, it'll be nice if mount and blade has a 5 second kill-cam or best kill-cam so that those who are new to mount and blade, learn some new tricks.
Problem would be the communication and server for X box and PS 4. I'm not sure how multiplayer works between PC and game console, will they separate it or combine them together.
By the way, did they mentioned anything about the multiplayer new game set from the latest interview?(probably still on development)
I may have lost track as I'm in the middle of doing my assignment for college.
With the increase popularity of games that are set in medieval/fantasy medieval ages (For honor, God of war latest series, of kings and men, kingdom come deliverance) . Not to mention Warhammer fantasy and warhammer 40k including others on the spotlight recently. I kept wondering how many interesting games will become underrated in the future....
New players need to watch white tunics (aka ludus admins) play, and they'll get an idea of how hard is it to become a master.