Users who are viewing this thread

No one is talking about playing to "have a wank" that's just you guys making false assumptions. We're just merely conversing about fleshing the system out so we get something more than just a baby soundboard and a black screen.

If anything, you're the one being weird here ignoring all our comments saying everything else should be implemented before even touching those mechanics, just so you could post your glorious comment. And even then, the modders could do it if they wanted after the E.A. is done. Hell, I could try myself.
k
 
I didn't put bugfix related issues in my list only content but what kind of UI problems did you encounter? I agree about the quests but I'ld rather prefer them working on it later in development and make it interesting than rushing now while the game is severely lacking and come up with boring ones tbh. It's also sad that we have minimal interaction with companions and nobles. Cavalry could be a bit more strong imo, other than that I don't really have a big problem with balance. I didn't encounter any major snowballing until western empire had a war with both battania and vlandia, I think we need rebellions where very agressive expansion leads to both peasant unrest in conquered places and conflict between the lords who want to gain as more land as they can. Civil wars could make a perfect setback for these kinds of situations.
As far as UI I'd we need the lock icon to actually lock items from being sold otherwise the sell all button is useless. I'd also like to see better icons for troops because it can get hard to tell what tier their in. I'd like to see stats of troops if I left click on them just like for heroes. Another thing that would be nice is some way to sort troops, say by tier, unit category etc. The button to recruit prisoners is way too small and doesn't need to be on a drop down when I click on the troop same with the level up button, just get rid of that damn drop down when clicking on a troop.

As far as balance no cav is way too strong, cav can roll over everything atm, archers need a nerf to accuracy. Bows and in fact all projectiles are way, way too accurate. There's almost no reason to bring infantry because cav and archers are just way better now.

Idk if you just haven't gotten very fair in your play through but I constantly see 1 faction get an upper hand and don't stop, and Battanian needs some serious love because that faction is just bad their infantry is suppose to be the best but they get wiped out in just about every character I've made. I'm sure there's probably others things I'm not thinking of right now.
 
I'ld appreciate to open certain topics under some conditions like requiring the registered game to comment. That way we could eliminate those who're pirating the game and duplicate accounts from the topics about development.
I pirated warband at first, loved it and bought it. Now also bought bannerlord. If I never had pirated the game, I would not have bought it, nor would I have bought bannerlord.

On the topic of your controversial romance suggestion:grin:, I agree some interaction would be nice, but I highly doubt anyone will mod the kind of things youre thinking of. Why not go play other games built for that kind of thing instead?
For me the top priority should be Feasts, Diplomacy, Castle Notables and more Quests diversity

I never understood why Feasts were removed they were a great mechanic to balance the game and have fun in peacetime
Agreed
 
I pirated warband at first, loved it and bought it. Now also bought bannerlord. If I never had pirated the game, I would not have bought it, nor would I have bought bannerlord.

On the topic of your controversial romance suggestion:grin:, I agree some interaction would be nice, but I highly doubt anyone will mod the kind of things youre thinking of. Why not go play other games built for that kind of thing instead?

Agreed
I'm not aganist piracy to try the games out first to see if you like it or not. Hell, most people do it when they're not sure if they'ld like it. I mean the piracy with no intention to support the company even if you like it very much and play it often.

There's nothing controversial about my suggestion, I'm tired of people who're not capable of understanding what they read. As for the modding, we'll see.. :xf-wink: Make no mistake I play adult games, too. If I wanna see that sort of content in Bannerlord with mods, why does it bother anyone?
 
I'm not aganist piracy to try the games out first to see if you like it or not. Hell, most people do it when they're not sure if they'ld like it. I mean the piracy with no intention to support the company even if you like it very much and play it often.

There's nothing controversial about my suggestion, I'm tired of people who're not capable of understanding what they read. As for the modding, we'll see.. :xf-wink: Make no mistake I play adult games, too. If I wanna see that sort of content in Bannerlord with mods, why does it bother anyone?
controversial
adjective
UK
causing disagreement or discussion

it IS controversial by definition

I guess it bothers people because it is a strange request. It is like asking a mod for GTA5 to be able to build cars, work on their engines etc. There are games built for that specific thing(like car mechanic simulator etc), and it is quite hard to implement it, and pointless if you ask me.
 
controversial
adjective
UK
causing disagreement or discussion

it IS controversial by definition

I guess it bothers people because it is a strange request. It is like asking a mod for GTA5 to be able to build cars, work on their engines etc. There are games built for that specific thing(like car mechanic simulator etc), and it is quite hard to implement it, and pointless if you ask me.
That "disagreement" is based on misunderstanding what was said, partly thx to a toxic troll who got muted by moderation (I hope for a long time). There's no disagreement for people who understood what I said. Check what those who seemingly "disagree" say, "sex scenes" "hardcore by TW?". That doesn't make it controversial just because lack of attention by some people who're quick to write a comment without reading it properly. And when we're talking about modding, if it doesn't work, it won't work, there's no reason it should bother anyone, it's dumb.
 
Last edited:
That's what I said, Hardcore part WILL be included by modders, even I'm thinking of modding it myself when we have the tools and game had a final launch. I didn't demand TW to add that sort of content, even if I'ld, I know they wouldn't. But adding stuff like I described shouldn't be a problem. We'ld finally have an experience of being married or having a romantic relationship rather than just a word in text that calls us husband/wife. I fail to see why it'ld be a bad idea. You write kissing and hugging and dining, some idiot or troll make it out like you ask TW to add porn into the game. If you find kissing or hugging offensive, I don't know in what kind of setup you were raised or how do you spent your time as even Disney cartoons have them and many games like Witcher 3 and Kingdom Come Deliverance have HARDCORE content, let alone the type of content I'm describing. It's not a taboo and it shouldn't be, you must have noticed the adult game section on steam if you're not living under a rock. The games will change even more towards of having all the content and ambitious projects will aim to create a very convincing version in parallel with real life. They can make a setting that can turn it on or off, for anyone for whatever reason doesn't like it. That's my opinion about the matter.
Jesus christ. You sound like someone who seriously needs to get laid.
 
Inappropriate behavior
Romance (like kissing, dancing, hugging, dining) and mistress options: Hardcore stuff will most likely come with the mods but maybe we can have some romance in the original too? Mistress options to have relationships with nobles, notables, even your companions when you're married or not. I'ld also like to being able to marry notables and companions.


- snip -
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd like to point out that people are arguing on a internet forum about a medieval fantasy video game. A lot of people here sound like virgins. XD
 
Jesus christ. You sound like someone who seriously needs to get laid.
I don't understand why you keep spamming my thread buddy. Any reason why you keep commenting on a topic that you already made an impression that you don't agree? You feel the need to keep coming here to masturbate your ego or something? You can imagine how does it look. This topic is intended as a discussion topic, keep your spams to yourself. Thank you.
 
Main quest should be removed entirely. The tutorial was nice. Rebuild main quest around the brother. Track down the brother by visiting the different factions and cities. Follow clues and complete quests for notables and nobels to find the brother and rebuild clan. Starting a kingdom should be player choice not a fetch quest.

Focus on:
#1 DIPLOMACY
#2 NOBEL RELATIONS
#3 SCENES & QUESTS
#4 SEIGE
 
Main quest should be removed entirely. The tutorial was nice. Rebuild main quest around the brother. Track down the brother by visiting the different factions and cities. Follow clues and complete quests for notables and nobels to find the brother and rebuild clan. Starting a kingdom should be player choice not a fetch quest.
I mean I'ld be okay with it if they didn't leave it at a repeating quest which has a deadline. If they would have left it as a passive quest, I'ld be less enthusiastic about its' progress. I don't think they'll remake the main quest at this point. For me to comment on whether to ask for its' removal or progress, I need to know how much more do they intend to include. If it still has much work, I'ld like the removal of Stop conspiracy quest for now until they decide to finish the main quest.
 
Back
Top Bottom