She was addressing her troops from the balcony of a church while appointing male generals to lead them in the battle.
Woman that is know to ever use sword only as a tool to beat her servants with it using the flat side.
She was commanding a ship, sailing around and ramming other ships. Mostly of her own side.
No they were not. I asked people to bring example of a women that are recorded to be fighting in battle during Middle Ages in the geographic area of what MB represents and they could not find a single one. Only examples they could bring was women disguised as men participating in the bar fights and women throwing axes at the enemy from their balconies during sieges.
Women were leading armies in battles on rare occasions, but they were not actually fighting in the battles. And when they led armies, it was usually not because they were skilled generals, but because of the authority of their position inherited from male relatives.
I am not excluding that some women actually fought in battle, but that was clearly very, very rare exception. There are millions of records of men in battles all through Medieval history. People who say that women fought in battle can't bring single example of a woman. There is probably reason for that.
It's not little. England had 3 Queens during Middle Ages and about +-40 Kings. Out of those 3 Queens one was on the throne just 9 days. That's ratio of about 7%. And England actually had fairly high ratio of Queens, if you go to count also say France, Russia and Turkey, you will get something like 2% ratio.
Moreover out of those 3 Queens no one was leading troops in battle let alone actuary fight in one.
Women are unrealistically over-represented in the positions of power, command and warfare in the game if compared to real historical facts.
Representation of a skills and value of a women in the Medieval combat, fair fight: