Raging Womble
Banned
I haven't a any point in this thread insulted them today. If I didn't break there rules what justification do they have to ban me
That is indeed true and I respect you for that.Raging Womble said:I haven't a any point in this thread insulted them today. If I didn't break there rules what justification do they have to ban me
PW is run by dictators. Just accept the ban and play something else.Raging Womble said:I haven't a any point in this thread insulted them today. If I didn't break there rules what justification do they have to ban me
Raging Womble said:OK. Firstly how am I meant to identify someone and show that I am talking to them if I dont use there name? Your rules are absolute bull****. After saying "you need to pay cart insurance" I either said "Joking" or I left him. I didnt make him pay it.
Sir Henry Ellis said:I find it ludicrous that he has been banned considering he did roleplay, although he didn't demand them to "Halt" he did, quite clearly, demand a toll, when this toll was not met, he attacked the player in question which is the norm of being a 'bandit' or 'thief'. I don't see a problem here with what Womble has done, regardless of what he has done on different servers or whether people care for him or not, he did not deserve to get banned in this case.
gamester494 said:Raging Womble said:OK. Firstly how am I meant to identify someone and show that I am talking to them if I dont use there name? Your rules are absolute bull****. After saying "you need to pay cart insurance" I either said "Joking" or I left him. I didnt make him pay it.
ooc tags Hey you there stop!
//jindran
It's not that hard.
gamester494 said:Sir Henry Ellis said:I find it ludicrous that he has been banned considering he did roleplay, although he didn't demand them to "Halt" he did, quite clearly, demand a toll, when this toll was not met, he attacked the player in question which is the norm of being a 'bandit' or 'thief'. I don't see a problem here with what Womble has done, regardless of what he has done on different servers or whether people care for him or not, he did not deserve to get banned in this case.
The rules state taxes has to be roleplayed, he did not met this standards in the previous logs.
He catched up with the people he chased yet again failed to roleplay means he cannot have killed them since he had no legit reason.
I am saying he should have demanded the players to stop so he could proper roleplay, he decided not to and instead kill the players again.
Firstly jammy I would like to point out that the complaint on the united forums was dealt with in my favour- I got a refund and unban.gamester494 said:Sir Henry Ellis said:I find it ludicrous that he has been banned considering he did roleplay, although he didn't demand them to "Halt" he did, quite clearly, demand a toll, when this toll was not met, he attacked the player in question which is the norm of being a 'bandit' or 'thief'. I don't see a problem here with what Womble has done, regardless of what he has done on different servers or whether people care for him or not, he did not deserve to get banned in this case.
The rules state taxes has to be roleplayed, he did not met this standards in the previous logs.
He catched up with the people he chased yet again failed to roleplay means he cannot have killed them since he had no legit reason.
I am saying he should have demanded the players to stop so he could proper roleplay, he decided not to and instead kill the players again.
Okay when it comes down to the rules we do accept suggestions and criticism when it is made on the correct forum. Which to my knowledge it has yet to be done. I would be more than happy to take part in a discussion via ts or on our personal forum.Raging Womble said:Firstly jammy I would like to point out that the complaint on the united forums was dealt with in my favour- I got a refund and unban.
Secondly, you don't seem to want to take in any suggestions with regards to the rules. Look at the "yet another one" thread. At which point do you or other key members of your team take part in the discussion?
And jarl, doing that would be as you say "metagaming" as I don't know his name I'd play how you insist- your only solution to metagaming is metagaming. PW was not designed for this and with all due respect, the 17th and jarlbalruff seem to be fairly new to this community and shoving rp down their necks and ignoring what key community members are saying really isn't the best way to run a setver. Secondly one of those unban requests is on this case. I was hesitant to make it, as your admins told me I could never be unbanned. Furthermore, why you need 4 admins surrounding me when I got banned is beyond me and I cant quite remember who said it, but one of you said "Who would like the honour of banning him?". Is this really the correct approach to admining a server which holds the majority of the playerbase?
If it is a debate about the ruleset of EU Union then it should be carried out on the EU Union forum.Raging Womble said:When a general debate as to rule sets takes place, that shouldn't happen in a private forum. That happens here. The fact that none of your admins took part in the discussion is disappointing. Furthermore, If you look at the logs you will see during this complaint I was polite constantly.
Jammy said:If it is a debate about the ruleset of EU Union then it should be carried out on the EU Union forum.Raging Womble said:When a general debate as to rule sets takes place, that shouldn't happen in a private forum. That happens here. The fact that none of your admins took part in the discussion is disappointing. Furthermore, If you look at the logs you will see during this complaint I was polite constantly.
Ignoring the insults and back to the topic at hand.Armie_knock said:I was talking to Jammy, he ninjad.
Why do you need to carry it out at your forum?.cuz u can ban,mute and talk like if u are special cuz its ur server and forum. Union admins are soooo special.