Dear Developer,Dear Sturgian Friends,
We are aware of situation and working on this issue.
Do not lose your hope, one day you will conquer Vlandian towns and take your revenge.
Edit : Also Aserai in same situation too.
[...] "Do not lose your hope, one day you will conquer Vlandian towns and take your revenge." [...]
Dear Developer,
Really curious if the position of cities and campaign map for Aserai and especially Sturgia is in its final form?
Or is there still a chance the map will be changed? As the map and city placements make playing Aserai and Sturgia a hassle.
I am currently examining reasons make these two factions weaker than others. What I see is one of main reason is economical. These two factions have less income compared to others. Two reasons of this are : 1-less average prosperity their settlements have 2-because they are isolated they have some other economical disadvantages (less tariffs, less loots...). When the reasons are proven (working on to prove currently) we can give these two factions better cultural advantages to overcome economical disadvantages. I do not think map easily changes but south lake is so big I wish there were a connection between Qasira and Poros or Askar to be located between Sanala and Quyaz. Probably that kind of things adds much to gameplay. However it can be late for this. These location/connection problems are generally in Aserai lands second problematic areas are Sturgians.
Dear Sturgian Friends,
We are aware of situation and working on this issue.
Do not lose your hope, one day you will conquer Vlandian towns and take your revenge.
Edit : Also Aserai in same situation too.
I am currently examining reasons make these two factions weaker than others. What I see is one of main reason is economical. These two factions have less income compared to others. Two reasons of this are : 1-less average prosperity their settlements have 2-because they are isolated they have some other economical disadvantages (less tariffs, less loots...). When the reasons are proven (working on to prove currently) we can give these two factions better cultural advantages to overcome economical disadvantages. I do not think map easily changes but south lake is so big I wish there were a connection between Qasira and Poros or Askar to be located between Sanala and Quyaz. Probably that kind of things adds much to gameplay. However it can be late for this. These location/connection problems are generally in Aserai lands second problematic areas are Sturgians.
Dear Sturgian Friends,
We are aware of situation and working on this issue.
Do not lose your hope, one day you will conquer Vlandian towns and take your revenge.
Edit : Also Aserai in same situation too.
Tier/Tier | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T1M | T2M | T3M | T4M | T5M | T6M |
T1 | 50% | 34% | 25% | 19% | 15% | 12% | 38% | 26% | 19% | 15% | 12% | 9% |
T2 | 72% | 50% | 36% | 28% | 22% | 18% | 55% | 38% | 28% | 21% | 17% | 14% |
T3 | 98% | 67% | 50% | 38% | 30% | 25% | 75% | 52% | 38% | 29% | 23% | 19% |
T4 | 100% | 87% | 64% | 50% | 40% | 32% | 97% | 67% | 49% | 38% | 30% | 25% |
T5 | 100% | 100% | 80% | 62% | 50% | 41% | 100% | 84% | 62% | 48% | 38% | 31% |
T6 | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 60% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 75% | 58% | 46% | 38% |
T1M | 65% | 44% | 33% | 25% | 20% | 16% | 50% | 34% | 25% | 19% | 15% | 12% |
T2M | 94% | 65% | 48% | 37% | 29% | 24% | 72% | 50% | 36% | 28% | 22% | 18% |
T3M | 100% | 88% | 65% | 50% | 40% | 33% | 98% | 67% | 50% | 38% | 30% | 25% |
T4M | 100% | 100% | 84% | 65% | 52% | 42% | 100% | 87% | 64% | 50% | 39% | 32% |
T5M | 100% | 100% | 100% | 81% | 65% | 53% | 100% | 100% | 80% | 62% | 50% | 41% |
T6M | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% | 65% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 60% | 50% |
You could create trade routes (like empire total war, the circles) They could act as cities for caravans/boats, so they can trade with nords/desert tribes.I am currently examining reasons make these two factions weaker than others. What I see is one of main reason is economical. These two factions have less income compared to others. Two reasons of this are : 1-less average prosperity their settlements have 2-because they are isolated they have some other economical disadvantages (less tariffs, less loots...). When the reasons are proven (working on to prove currently) we can give these two factions better cultural advantages to overcome economical disadvantages. I do not think map easily changes but south lake is so big I wish there were a connection between Qasira and Poros or Askar to be located between Sanala and Quyaz. Probably that kind of things adds much to gameplay. However it can be late for this. These location/connection problems are generally in Aserai lands second problematic areas are Sturgians.
Another video with Offenbach - Can Can Music
Just want to chime in and say I have no problem at all with the campaign map changing. If it can help balance the factions better than go for it, also have whoever is in charge of the map move Sargot back north please (just swap names with something). Maybe we should do a poll to see how people feel about future changes to the map/town locations?I am currently examining reasons make these two factions weaker than others. What I see is one of main reason is economical. These two factions have less income compared to others. Two reasons of this are : 1-less average prosperity their settlements have 2-because they are isolated they have some other economical disadvantages (less tariffs, less loots...). When the reasons are proven (working on to prove currently) we can give these two factions better cultural advantages to overcome economical disadvantages. I do not think map easily changes but south lake is so big I wish there were a connection between Qasira and Poros or Askar to be located between Sanala and Quyaz. Probably that kind of things adds much to gameplay. However it can be late for this. These location/connection problems are generally in Aserai lands second problematic areas are Sturgians.