I think Vlandia for now is the most "illogical" faction, i've remade it to better illustratte how it should be:
Just read this from Wyzilla in Pacth Notes - b0.8.0 thread and i totally agree:
Didn't see there was mails chausse, so indeed Knights should have those and not sergeants.
The reason for transitional helmet not being use by infantry is that it is really protective ok but really much diminishing your senses (vision and hardness of hearing). Knights are most of the time fighting mounted so the advantage of this helm when mounted is far better than when fighting on foot where it becomes a disadvantage. That's why i said before it's a knight helm.
I like the new Huscarl !
Just read this from Wyzilla in Pacth Notes - b0.8.0 thread and i totally agree:
Why do the Knights have no maille chausses yet the sergeants, ie foot troops, have maille chausses. If you're going for a Norman kind of look, then having no armor on the legs is on the money, but if armored chausses exist they would be worn by cavalry, not infantry. Maille chausses would probably be the least concern of any infantryman who has to pay for his own gear. Additionally a transitional great helm seems an odd choice for infantry, as there's not really anything pointing to such helmets being used by non-cavalry units, and probably a reason behind that. It would also help distinguish knights/sergeants from each other if all knights had transitional great helms while the sergeants had conical helmets or kettle helms to set them aside from cav.
Didn't see there was mails chausse, so indeed Knights should have those and not sergeants.
The reason for transitional helmet not being use by infantry is that it is really protective ok but really much diminishing your senses (vision and hardness of hearing). Knights are most of the time fighting mounted so the advantage of this helm when mounted is far better than when fighting on foot where it becomes a disadvantage. That's why i said before it's a knight helm.
I like the new Huscarl !
Last edited: