What about me?
I'm surprised you'd let somebody off the hook, even though it could be argued he's laying low after the initial attention you gave him.Bodrax said:I'm not that big on Arch3r right now. Still a good lynch, but we probably have a better shot with a couple others.
Yeah, Zhou is an obvious choice. But it really feels a bit too easy to be true. Yes, I know there have been instances when "too easy to be true" proved to be "true" after all, but I don't know. It would be extremely clumsy for him to be a wolf.I don't like Zhou announcing his unvote (that still hasn't come) and he shot up quite a bit in my list. Liefr post also got a lot of alarms ringing. And I'm still not comfortable with Rocketsheep.
Orgasmo said:My Top 4:
1. McConor
2. Rocket sheep
3. Archer
4. Bodrax
The last two are hard to explain.
Since working on a Mac, I've learned to use WrappersOrgasmo said:I have my reasons, Bodrax, but they involve going into some heavy duty MIFOM.
Orgasmo said:What about me?
Heh, to be quite honest, he's doing a fair deal to move the game along. I think it would be hurtful for activity to lynch him right now.Big McLarge-Huge said:I'm surprised you'd let somebody off the hook, even though it could be argued he's laying low after the initial attention you gave him.
I'd like for someone else to be driving the wagon this game. The original goal was to just support the new players. Coach them a little, if I can put it this way.Also the way Bodrax seems to be willing to go with just about anybody that's on offer is weird. Mind you, Bodrax comes across as somebody who likes his fair share of chaos and revels in doing unexpected twists and turns, but I'd expect him to draw a line somewhere. To me it makes no sense to be considering the wagon on Bowser at the same time as considering voting those that are behind that wagon. He seems more opportunistic than...I'd expect somebody called Bodrax to be.
Really? Must have missed this. But I'll admit, that might be my mistake for skimming things a bit too casually.Bodrax said:Heh, to be quite honest, he's doing a fair deal to move the game along. I think it would be hurtful for activity to lynch him right now.Big McLarge-Huge said:I'm surprised you'd let somebody off the hook, even though it could be argued he's laying low after the initial attention you gave him.
I can understand that, as this is part of the same reason of why I'm taking this quite casually and answer more questions, rather than "ripping into" people's comments. Yet it would be unfair to assume that all the experienced players would have gotten automatically innocent roles. So when my gut feels unhappy with what you do, I'm not gonna scold it for it.I'd like for someone else to be driving the wagon this game. The original goal was to just support the new players. Coach them a little, if I can put it this way.Also the way Bodrax seems to be willing to go with just about anybody that's on offer is weird. Mind you, Bodrax comes across as somebody who likes his fair share of chaos and revels in doing unexpected twists and turns, but I'd expect him to draw a line somewhere. To me it makes no sense to be considering the wagon on Bowser at the same time as considering voting those that are behind that wagon. He seems more opportunistic than...I'd expect somebody called Bodrax to be.
If you want to run Windows stuff on a Mac (like...uh...games), then often you'll need a "wrapper", basically an emulating package that lets you run the Windows stuff from the desktop. Anyhow, if you don't know what that is (or can guess it the first time around), then the joke probably doesn't work.Orgasmo said:Mac Wrappers? You've lost me Biggie McLarge.
It's really quite easy, despite Orgasmo telling you otherwise (don't listen to him, he is, well, special is the word used nowadays, I think). If you think the players is honestly trying to find the wolves, he's innocent. If you think the player wants to deceive us and is more worried about his survival, he's a wolf.Teofish said:Not that I really know diddly ****e about this hunting business anyhow.
More than most, at any rate.Big McLarge-Huge said:Really? Must have missed this. But I'll admit, that might be my mistake for skimming things a bit too casually.
Then I stand by my vote. Something about his whole gig feels....off somehow.Bodrax said:It's really quite easy, despite Orgasmo telling you otherwise (don't listen to him, he is, well, special is the word used nowadays, I think). If you think the players is honestly trying to find the wolves, he's innocent. If you think the player wants to deceive us and is more worried about his survival, he's a wolf.Teofish said:Not that I really know diddly ****e about this hunting business anyhow.
King Bowser said:I will clue you losers in on this, my vote for Bodrax was purely for saying I "may be" wolf when that was clearly something he pulled out of his rearmost pipe. Plus I wanted to riff on his alphabet-soup name for a while. And he was getting beat on by some other huge large guy whose name I can't recall.
Borat could be a villain, but he's probably not a plumber, and that's what's important.
It's not like anyone is even asking me any questions here. You're not giving reasons, wah wah wah, but I can't be bothered to ask what you think of X, Y, or Z! Some hunting. Can't even get your top suspect to spew any information before he dies. No wonder you dropouts are all back in school. At least I had an excuse, I had kingdoms to conquer and maintain!
I beat up on plumbers because it amuses me, that's all the reasoning I'm prepared to give. But I'll tell you who I'd beat up on and who I wouldn't.
After I am "lynched" I will continue talking to this group. Because it's obvious you need my superior brains.