MaHuD said:It does make sense, since people will vote you after Delta is dead. Right now pushing for specifically an Eternal lynch would probably lead to nowhere.
Just because I don't write down logic, doesn't mean it is non existent.
MaHuD said:It does make sense, since people will vote you after Delta is dead. Right now pushing for specifically an Eternal lynch would probably lead to nowhere.
Just because I don't write down logic, doesn't mean it is non existent.
Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:* "as I don't believe an experienced wolf would have lynched me..." = "as I don't believe an experienced wold would have lunched me..."
Moose! said:With that in mind, I think that Eternal is right, and that we definitely are playing against at least one experienced wolf. I'd much rather go for one of them then go for Delta.
Moose! said:Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:* "as I don't believe an experienced wolf would have lynched me..." = "as I don't believe an experienced wold would have lunched me..."
I can see a wolf Adaham or Xardob lynching you to create some WIFOMy confusion over the night kill, since you were so closely aligned with them. The other obvious option would be because you were accusing someone (i.e., Delta K or Vieira because those were who you suspected with your first life if I recall correctly), but we know that at least one of them is innocent.
Moose! said:Agreed that I think Lumos is a good choice for the wolves. Smart players like to go for lurkers, because it causes chaos and is hard to read for the village (or at least, that's what Xardob told me last game).
Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:Moose! said:Agreed that I think Lumos is a good choice for the wolves. Smart players like to go for lurkers, because it causes chaos and is hard to read for the village (or at least, that's what Xardob told me last game).
And here's something Xardob told me, in Aust's Dwarfcraft game: for the first 2 days, the lynches tend to be quieter/lurkier players. From Day 3 onwards, it tends to be the more active players who get lynched. If you can get your quieter/lurkier wolf past Day 2, they stand a good chance of making it to the finish.
That was (partially) how we won that game.
So far, the first 2 lynches have been relatively true to form. If Delta IS a wolf, then if we don't lynch her today, we never will.
Now that's just low. I don't post for a couple days and suddenly I'm a lurker? I was busy and had internet problems yesterday. I'll try to post something later tonight.Moose! said:Well if we want to lynch a lurker now, then we might as well lynch Xardob.
Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:Anybody voting Moose gets my vote.
Vermillion_Hawk said:Vote: Moose!.
I'd rather go for MaHuD or Eternal, but I guess it makes no difference the order we lynch the wolves.Big McLarge-Huge said:Vote: Vermillion Hawk
Xardob said:Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:Anybody voting Moose gets my vote.Vermillion_Hawk said:Vote: Moose!.
I wasn't sure of Vieira being guilty. I was sure that he was one of the four possible wolves. Now that he's gone, I'm sure. Everybody else is innocent. But you want reasons? I shall give you some.Moose! said:That's big talk for someone who was so sure of Vieira's guilt. Want to try and convince me this time?
This is just lazy. Not necessarily wolfish, but I'm not going to let it pass because people shouldn't get away with crap reasons like these, or some wolves might exploit them. Hawk is basically just saying that the more talkative players are suspicious and should be lynched. I predict this mindset loses the game tomorrow.Vermillion_Hawk said:Moose, you're not boding well for me asking those kind of questions, but that's for another day. Xardob or Adaham or Llandy should die today, no questions asked. The number of inactive patsies is narrowing down and now these three, plus Moose, should be in the firing line.
I don't even know what this means. Does it have any purpose?Vermillion_Hawk said:I should say though, Lumos and Vieira were hardly inactive, but they can seem as such when other players have entire blocks of text spread over multiple posts devoted to themselves. So they become natural targets for the wolves.
Now this is the actual wolfish bit. Calling yesterday lynch a random one is a misrepresentation at best. Adaham and I were set on Vieira since the beginning of the day. He was our top suspect and only someone very dishonest could say otherwise.Vermillion_Hawk said:The Xardob/Llandy/Adaham trio are, so far, more suspicious than any other group in my opinion, though, mostly because they're almost wholly to blame for the fiasco of yesterday's random killing instead of an organized lynch which would have advanced one case or another. Basically a free wolf action, even if Vieira was a minor suspect for some of them.
At this point I'm not sure if he's misunderstanding things on purpose or if he's just flinging whatever **** he comes up with on the spot.Vermillion_Hawk said:Moose! said:Interestingly enough, if enough doctors end up dead, we should get rid of VH too, since he essentially outed himself as a doctor, and the chances of him being one are quickly diminishing, now that 3 are gone.
Okay, I've officially been convinced otherwise.
Vote: Moose!.
If your gambit pays off and I get lynched there should now be enough information out there to out you as scum to a hopefully-cognizant village.
I'd just like to point out the logical fallacy here. You know which kind of player attack innocents more often? Other innocents.Vermillion_Hawk said:Then either way you're scum, either for recognizing a wolf and failing to vote for one or for attacking an innocent.
Freudian slip? I'd rather you don't eat me. I don't taste very good. Besides, there's barely any meat for you, just bones and skin.Moose! said:Nah, I'd rather put my mouth on Xardob.
I still haven't heard a single good reason why we should lynch Adaham. Care to provide one or is it just too much work for fabricate a case?Eternal said:Sorry chaps, I didn't join the innocent lynch wagon the last two times and I'm not about to start now. A vote for Adaham is a vote to lynch an actual wolf.
Xardob said:This is just lazy. Not necessarily wolfish, but I'm not going to let it pass because people shouldn't get away with crap reasons like these, or some wolves might exploit them. Hawk is basically just saying that the more talkative players are suspicious and should be lynched. I predict this mindset loses the game tomorrow.
Xardob said:Now this is the actual wolfish bit. Calling yesterday lynch a random one is a misrepresentation at best. Adaham and I were set on Vieira since the beginning of the day. He was our top suspect and only someone very dishonest could say otherwise.
But the best thing about this post is how he blames us for causing a random lynch and preventing an organized course of action by the village after making absolutely no effort to contribute to said organization. He just voted and stayed back, waiting for things to happen. (I won't even go on about the merit of how organized villages are every wolf dream.)
Xardob said:I'd just like to point out the logical fallacy here. You know which kind of player attack innocents more often? Other innocents.