Still Bannerlord is a good game. I see too much critisism but even these features are removed still we have a good and detailed game. Its not perfect of course and will not be a game with 95+ rating but also it does not deserve that much critisism. I was ok when I learnt that feature is removed did not resist much because its understandable, this was a risky design. Has great potential but hard to implement for a small-medium studio. My preference was that design of course however current design is good too only needs some more work especially for castles.
i think bannerlord is still a good game, but it's just that when you compare it with what has been done before it is still disappointing and frustrating
why hasn't viking conquest been a bigger source of inspiration on the equivalent of features as well as on his ideas ?
is it a problem of time, choice or other?