I did because its the truth if its that hard for you to understand that TW can do whatever they want with their creation and arent limited to their inspiration you are stupid
Just don't bother bro
Making a completely incorrect statement is not an argument (which is what im guessing you meant to say), unless you actually mean the word argue, as in often meaningless emotional conversations that does not need to hold to fact, then yes, i guess you can argue, but i see no point in doing so on this forum. You did clearly not know the definition of the term you were using and therefor used it wrongly. the end.
I made my arguments further up, but maybe you did not read them or understand them, I wrote your post, that your argument was made on an invalid premise, that you thought historical fiction means something it does not, look up what the definition for historical fiction is, its not what you claimed it was (by saying its what Bannerlord is) your grasp on the english language is clearly not very good, so maybe you are misunderstanding, or you are just trolling, eitherway i cant see much reason to keep on writing with you as its clearly a waste of time, when you dont know simple definitions or some to get lost in what we were talking about, look up the definition of Historical Fiction and tell me how Bannerlord fits in that genre, which it does not, that was the arguement you were making, that i said was not valid. Instead of actually answering what i said was wrong with your argumentation, i suspect you will come back with more of the same, trying to be demeaning and making your self seem superior, witch you fail at with sentences like "You clearly don't know definition of the world argument," (you talking about an argument spanning the entire world here or an argument about the entirety of our world?)
i told you to look up the definition yourself, so that you would not have to take my word for it, but i guess i have to, so im not undoing my self, lol. "Historical fiction is a literary genre in which the plot takes place in a setting located in the past." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_fiction
Just dont bother bro his brain is as empty as a shell
So taking another fictional universe and saying, see its also this way here, is not really a valid argument, its like me saying, see in The Hunger Games where a girl beats everyone else, clearly must mean women are more clever than all men. Also just using the term "virtue signalling" is a charged term that already makes me take anything you say less seriously. Try reading The Wheel of Time instead of A Song of Ice and Fire (Where Game of Thrones came from)
I dont take offence to it, im just saying its a charged term and not needed there. you could have made a valid argument without it. When it comes to your arguement about GoT, that worked for you, that does not mean thats a universal truth. I have seen many who thought GoT had too many women in battle roles aswell, claiming it was unrealistic. I was just saying, just because one fictional universe did something, does not mean another one needs to do it. I would definately prefer not to see women like "The Sandsnakes" from GoT implemented in a game, and prefer something like Brienne for sure, but i dont have any issue with female party leaders or notables, as the game does not take place in an historical setting in our world. I prefer a setting like that from Wheel of Time (in regard to Bannerlord without the magic fantasy elements ofcourse) as it is just more interesting. If Taleworlds had made Viking Conquest 2, then i think it would have been more proper to talk about historical acuracy, cause then it is historical fiction. Calradia though is not and therefor i dont have en issue with it.
Yeah sieges are a part M&B that doesnt make it historical fiction and my god the irony is palpable
You clearly dont have a good grasp on english with what you just wrote there, Saying that the past has horses, and Game of Thrones has horses, does not make make Game of Thrones historical fiction, which is pretty much your argument. You completely misunderstand the definition, to fit Bannerlord would need to have an actual map from our world, with the same names of places and people like Julius Ceasar or Alfred of England, but im done here, cause either you are a troll our your grasp of english is so bad that you will never understand even these simple things, so either way its a waste of time, you have dug your own hole here though, with showing your complete lack of comprehension.
Yeah i should clearly not have wasted my time, im guessing he is a troll, i have a hard time believing someone can be so dense, but atleast people will be able to read just how far out he is now. I mean wow.... just wow...
Honestly i lose a braincell every second i spend on these forums since some of the people here like bruh
yeah i wonder why i bother sometimes aswell, guess im just looking for the feel of the old forums, but im guessing thats just lost in time.
Like there is hardly an inbetween in these forums anymore you're either really smart or really stupid i remember in the old forums i just lurked a bunch with no account
