Why am I not surprised that the first four replies are all attacks on the validity of the study and calls that this all is just another sexist ploy against men.
MMontage and Untitled, I'd be very interested if you could dig up anything about that study or report you wrote about. I have a vague recollection that one of the generational health surveys found that teenage girls were catching up with boys when it came to smoking, drinking, and fighting, but that was ten years ago or more.
Wheem, you can check the methodology here:
http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-violence-against-women-survey-methodology-qa_en.pdf
MMontage and Untitled, I'd be very interested if you could dig up anything about that study or report you wrote about. I have a vague recollection that one of the generational health surveys found that teenage girls were catching up with boys when it came to smoking, drinking, and fighting, but that was ten years ago or more.
Wheem, you can check the methodology here:
http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-violence-against-women-survey-methodology-qa_en.pdf
So they weren't asked "have you been abused" but instead asked specific questions.8. How did the survey measure physical/sexual/psychological violence?
Respondents were asked questions about specific violent acts which the respondent may
have experienced – such as being kicked, slapped, hit, etc. Earlier research has shown that
in this way respondents are more likely to remember and identify incidents of violence. The
questions on experiences of violence did not use terms such as ‘rape’ or ‘abuse’ which
respondents might understand in different ways.