I dont know him. And, holocaust is clearly an historical savagery/massacre. When its so clear, idk how he is a denier. A valuable process needed in court(thesis antithesis synthesis) to weed out the lies..
Btw you can check this page:
en.wikipedia.org
(especiall at
World War II section)
@MadVader my historical knowledge is very poor. Just be sure the armenian side's historicans bring their all arguments with documents in a valuable court.
@dijiTurk correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that it isn't even legal in Turkey to admit that the Armenian genocide happened. How can we be expected to trust Turkish historians' objectivity on this when they can't even operate in their country unless they support the official government position?
Probably yes, its not legal to tell that argument, because turkish historicans say that they have documentation(that from all historical sources from that years) for refusing genocide arguments, and they(historicans) want to go open court.
I believe armenian side also says "there is no geniocide" argument is not legal to admit, too.
That's why i say, a righteous/universal/valuable court must take all argument, and close the case at the side of truth for all the world.
I can say that there are 4 kind of believers releated with the armenian genocide argument as i see:
1- Ppl that think: there is no genocide
2- Ppl that think: there is genocide
3- Ppl that think: in the war environment, bad events took place on both sides.
4- Marginal minority/animals that think: hitler was innocent & there is no genocide
etc
All we need is a valuable universal court system that all arguments & documents will be exucuted inside in law.
We need to identify it if there is a genocide or not, and also we need to guard rights as much as we can, and we need to prevent future genocides/war crimes etc. Starting from education system at countries; we must improve systems.. Truth must be found, lesson must be learnt for all cases at all over the world. These is my approach in the subject.
And, if u ask my idea, #2 or #3 may be the truth. Idk.(i just know history is full of dark events at all contenents). I want to see truth as well. But only valuable court(not just court) can bring it right to the surface.
Also, dont forget, there is not only armanien genocide arguments. There is also,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khojaly_massacre Khojaly massacre. There is also Frence's / US's / bla bla bla... massacres. If historicans wants help stoping conflicts at the worlds/giving rights backto oppressed peoples/making future better ; then valuble courts should see all cases, from all countries; so all(world) can see truth, and take the lesson for a valuable future together. (some arguments may be wrong, a valuable courts/lawyers/historicans/documantation must be there to see argument's situation).