Ok, so, I normally like to think things in their contextualized complexity... but I've been watching some videos of people playing warband's campaign, and was thinking if one of the problems of Bannerlord is that the map is huge in comparison with warband's and there are SO MANY of them clans everywhere.
That simple.
Do you think that Bannerlord would benefit from a smaller map and less clans?
I guess that it would reduce the meat grinder of army after army after army and maybe make the battles more meaningful cause' there wouldn't be so much lords hanging around forming armies non-stop. There would be less battles and there would be less vassals, and maybe if there are some personality traits that do function, maybe allow them to shine for a change...
I kinda remember someone talking about this in the forums, but i did a little search and couldn't find it.
So, what do you think? Aye or nay?
Ps.: I know that they wouldn't do anything like that at this point, this is just some musings...
That simple.
Do you think that Bannerlord would benefit from a smaller map and less clans?
I guess that it would reduce the meat grinder of army after army after army and maybe make the battles more meaningful cause' there wouldn't be so much lords hanging around forming armies non-stop. There would be less battles and there would be less vassals, and maybe if there are some personality traits that do function, maybe allow them to shine for a change...
I kinda remember someone talking about this in the forums, but i did a little search and couldn't find it.
So, what do you think? Aye or nay?
Ps.: I know that they wouldn't do anything like that at this point, this is just some musings...