I made my arguments further up, but maybe you did not read them or understand them, I wrote your post, that your argument was made on an invalid premise, that you thought historical fiction means something it does not, look up what the definition for historical fiction is, its not what you claimed it was (by saying its what Bannerlord is) your grasp on the english language is clearly not very good, so maybe you are misunderstanding, or you are just trolling, eitherway i cant see much reason to keep on writing with you as its clearly a waste of time, when you dont know simple definitions or some to get lost in what we were talking about, look up the definition of Historical Fiction and tell me how Bannerlord fits in that genre, which it does not, that was the arguement you were making, that i said was not valid. Instead of actually answering what i said was wrong with your argumentation, i suspect you will come back with more of the same, trying to be demeaning and making your self seem superior, witch you fail at with sentences like "You clearly don't know definition of the world argument," (you talking about an argument spanning the entire world here or an argument about the entirety of our world?)