So, women leading armies is *as fantastical* as dragons and magic?
Bannerlord is not historical fantasy, historical fantasy is taking a historical setting like Rome and then putting magic into it, its very much not historic, unless you start claiming that Calradia is this Narnia like universe, where military people from 100s of years apart somehow got a portal into the same world and instead of mixing up, kept their own disstinct armors and weapons. Calradia does not have any link to our world and it does not have magic, neither does it have any of our major religions, that brought forward alot of the attitude towards what women had to be (lesser than man). So at most its a fictional setting, a fantasy, that takes inspiration from some of our cultures when it comes to military, but clearly not religion. So i cant see why some women in battle is so unrealistic, when types you are already putting types of military up against each other who would never have met. Its about pushing the boundries of belief and that you balk at women in battle againt all the other things that are "unrealistic" in this setting, shows more about you than us.
No its not in a simplified manner calradia is not a real place and if TW decides that calradia is now called poopy land that will be the new canon matter not like or not it is based of irl cultures does not mean the world is the same as our own if TW decides its a way it is that way and there is no changing it
Well we were speaking mainly in a commander role or as notables. not warriors. through there have been civilizations that had female warriors, religions and their view on women is a major part of of why that went away. Also you seem to think battles casualties are higher than they actually are, just because you loose a battle does not mean all lives are lost and a society is completely ruined, but again my point about all the other unrealistic things that are in the game was side skirted, why is female notables the BIG issue, and not soldiers in large armies dying of diseases, or the one about time periodes being forced together or the language all being the same when back in the middelages you would find so many different languages over short distances that you would have to have a common language to communicate, or how many weapons you can carry and weapon swapping?!?! how many people have you seen backholster a spear? theres so many more, but for some women is the the place they get upset and cry about, using terms like "waman" "PC culture" ect... clearly shows that their issue is more to do with women in general than with historical acuracy.
its definately not historical fiction either, as that takes place in a real setting but often with fictional people living in real events, or making up fictional stories for real know people. Its a fantasy game that takes some inspiration from history, witch most fantasy does, you would not call Tolkien histoical fantasy just because it has inspiration from weapons and lore from our own history.
My god this thread also makes me lose my faith in humanity loke ***** if this the problem you focused on from a fictional world and not actual problems makes me think we didnt get the same game
Yeah, like come on. Let's go back to nitpicking about perks or something lol.
A lot more fun
I really hope the new scouting perks become more part centric than personal. Looking forward to seeing them.
Honestly I think the big thing about perks that they are probably trying to do is make them fun and impactful since rn you dont really feel that speed or damage bonus especially late on i think they are trying to actually like make mechanics with them so it isnt just flat values
i agree, i just hope they are more party centric, but the duality function of the newer traits would likely work well in scouting. if they can find enough personal bonuses that makes sense with a party bonus. like map movementspeed/personal movementspeed vs the pick of longer scouting range on map/better bow acuracy. we will see
