Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:I'vebeaten some info out ofheard from the rest of the players.
Delta[K] said:@hawk do you still think Adaham is a wolf?
Delta[K] said:Nor do I genuinely suspect Brutus. I didn't like the fact that he changes his votes in a blink of an eye and it initially made me suspicious of him but I now attribute his actions to what he said about suspecting those who vote for him when he is innocent. That and liquor. For me that was enough for me to accept his sporadic voting.
I suspect vermillion hawk. He came back for day 2 and suggested adaham killed llandy v.1 to break up llandy/xardob voting bloc. I can understand him sticking with his guns but as it has previously been mentioned adaham had no reason to get you out of the way given that you two had a deal. Wifom though... hmm
Xardob said:So nice of you to give me the vote I was robbed of by the wolves. Thanks.
Moose! said:No, given that your alternative was an innocent.Eternal said:Not voting delta, didn't we already learn to not lynch compromise easy lynches?
Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:It would seem that you are a far better compromise than Delta.
Would you describe yourself as an easy lynch?
Delta[K] said:My suspicion was first on him when he started to make a case against you. It was abrupt and I took it as he was pushing you for information because it seemed to me that his case was off like he threw it together with some reasonable sounding stuff. I waited but he continued to make a case against you. This is what made me suspicious of both of you. I thought about the possibility of the you two being packmates and him making a case to draw a line between you two but half hearted enough to not really get you lynched. I considered myself in wifom territory and poked at eternal to see how the two of you would react. V.1 you turning out to be innocent did not affect my opinion of eternal greatly because I considered the fact that he may have voted you to give mark him innocent. Why would he kill you during the night if he was planning on voting you during the morning? Of course, wifom. Either way, I do not like his actions during day 1. Any plausible explanation for his actions can be argued in circles which is why I decided to keep watch. My gut says something's off and I am looking for solid evidence. I agree though, I have been going about this the wrong way. I should take more initiative and hunt rather than just sit on my arse.
vote: eternal
Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:How many of those would you be willing to lynch today (or tomorrow, whatever)?
WTF, dude? I've been the main proponent of lynching Vieira all day long, and Hawk/Eternal has been in the mix as well for me. So if anything, you should finally join me in voting Vieira (which you've sort of hinted at wanting to do, but never did).Xardob said:Join me in voting for Eternal (or MaHuD, or Vieira or Hawk). Then you won't need to worry about this.
Big McLarge-Huge said:See, Lumos reaction to my pressure before I left was indeed pretty villagery, but maybe he's just a natural talent when it comes to lying. After all, Mark Wahlberg is his role model, and we all know how he ended up killing that old lady!
Thing is, Lumos - after the storm calmed - went back to his super-lurky ways, and I don't like it. It only shows that he's following enough to react quickly at anything directed at him, but doesn't hunt by himself whatsoever.
Big McLarge-Huge said:WTF, dude? I've been the main proponent of lynching Vieira all day long, and Hawk/Eternal has been in the mix as well for me. So if anything, you should finally join me in voting Vieira (which you've sort of hinted at wanting to do, but never did).