B Medieval [WB] Crusader - Way to expiation

Users who are viewing this thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
teun557 said:
will you be able to pick you relegion at the start?
We discussing it, and most likely yes.
MasterArcher said:
How much more intill its finished?
Dont know. It deppends of some new features what we testing now. If they will work so we will include it in mod and that will take some time to make it playable.
Dandelion said:
This would bring the mod to another level of awesomeness, though it's already incredible...
We will make new skins.
Lux said:
This mod looks extremely badass. I saw mention of assassinations in the first post, but couldn't find it explained, how will that work?
It is secret information. If I tell you about it Then I'll have to kill you.  :lol:
Winterz said:
-Will you put Balian of Ibelin's sons as lords?
Ibelin family is represented in mod. Ibelins will have their own heraldry.
kuauik said:
Der Einzige said:
e70d6671288c.jpg

If these are Templars I would not say they are historically accurate.
only ahistorical thing on them are the "aliettes" shoulder pads,they were invented by the end of the 13th century
Can you share with any sources about aliettes ? I mean the time-frame.
Outlawed said:
Colonel_Gizmo said:
Still arguing about the paint on a damn helmet? Find something a bit more constructive to do, for the love of God...

Historical accuracy is a very interesting and debatable topic.
Kindly refrain from insulting those who enjoy it.
Thanks.
Yes it is very interesting and useful but we take into account only the information, confirmed by sources. Proof links please.
 
By  this article 1250 - 1350 on contrary to wiki (1290 and 1325),
thus using this books for data;

Bibliography:
European Arms & Armor, by Charles Henry Ashdown
Knights, by Andrea Hopkins
Arms & Uniforms, Age of Chivalry, by Liliane & Fred Funcken
Encyclopedic Dictionary of Heraldry, by Julian Franklyn & John Tanner
Heraldry - Sources, Symbols, & Meaning, by Ottfried Neubecker
Dictionary of Heraldry, by Stephen Friar
 
Zimke Zlovoljni said:
By  this article 1250 - 1350 on contrary to wiki (1290 and 1325),
thus using this books for data;

Bibliography:
European Arms & Armor, by Charles Henry Ashdown
Knights, by Andrea Hopkins
Arms & Uniforms, Age of Chivalry, by Liliane & Fred Funcken
Encyclopedic Dictionary of Heraldry, by Julian Franklyn & John Tanner
Heraldry - Sources, Symbols, & Meaning, by Ottfried Neubecker
Dictionary of Heraldry, by Stephen Friar
doesn't matter,but anyway the allietes are late for the mod period
 
Are you guys seriously arguing about when they were invented?
I'm pretty sure somebody had thought of fixing metal plates to their shoulders before that time. You can't really talk about an invention date.
 
Zimke Zlovoljni said:
EDITED:
It is 29 years close to mod period (if we count the end of the forth crusade) , that's pretty close, why not to use them.

How long time have you lived buddy? Have the military changed since you were born? Yes.

Lux said:
Are you guys seriously arguing about when they were invented?
I'm pretty sure somebody had thought of fixing metal plates to their shoulders before that time. You can't really talk about an invention date.

There's no way to rule it out, but you have to rely on what you know, if you start assuming what the knights wore or didn't wear, you'll quickly end up with something that isn't historical accurate at all.
 
Zimke Zlovoljni said:
EDITED:
It is 29 years close to mod period (if we count the end of the forth crusade) , that's pretty close, why not to use them.
You wouldn't suggest adding an M16 to a world war two game because it was invented within 29 years of the war's close. Why is it more exceptable if it's set in the 13th century?
 
Because
a) the M16 has an exact invention date and
b) because nothing much like the M16 existed before it was invented; plates of metal fixed to the shoulders, however, are an idea anyone who has two metal plates and is going into battle can think up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom