Mage246
I'm fine, thanks for the offer.
Nice sentiment. I'll try to echo it in my future interactions with you, maw, as much as I want to disagree with you on everything.maw said:As a side note - slapping Jhess around by demeaning her, or anyone else, isn't fairplay.
rejenorst said:As for Jess, I like Jhessail. She's got balls. And I like her balls.
You could have fooled me.kenski1 said:Jhessail said:What the **** are you talking about? Played too much Modern Warfare? Why the **** would you want to force an amphibious landing on Iran? When the ****ing country has 60% of it's borders vulnerable to Afghanistan and Iraq in the first place? And if you add Uzbekistan and Turkey, you got ALL her land borders in the mix.kenski1 said:Very true but although I'm certain that if they did make such a foolish mistake as to declare a state of war against us we would most defiantly win the war. They could cause many problems, right now we do not have the means to force an effective amphibious landing which would be the main way into Iran although we could do it it would cost us many life's, without the harrier force and with no carriers, but I very much doubt there will be anykind of war.It's not as if they could do anything to us or our allies. =/
The worst they could do would be to send troops into Afghanistan or Iraq.
1. I don't even have modern warfare.
First, learn to use punctuation. Especially since you seem to be writing in your native language. Makes a much better impression. But since the content of your post was such a mindless gibberish, I'm afraid that not even perfect grammar and spelling would help you.kenski1 said:2. Maybe before making claims such as that you should look at those countries you mentioned Iran's strongest border is her western border after the iraq-iran war to her east the border is not as well fortified or defended but it is a mostly open desert with no real strategic importance and the Iranians would be able to pull their line of defence further back to their more populated and industrial region near the west, also there is only one narrow front along the Afghanistan border with only one good road for logistics, Pakistan would never assist in an invasion and Turkmenistan would never assist either, the desert to the east is also a logistic hell the lack of roads that could be we defended by Iranian forces and mined and lack of infrastructure makes an invasion from the east near impossible I only said an amphibious landing is the best method but very hard as i mentioned earlier. Turkeys eastern border is the worst postion to invade from due to the terrorist forces in the area its would cause logistics hell for any invasion, and Uzbekistan learn some geography how the hell could Uzbekistan be used.
TARDIS said:Dat necro. But I'd have to agree, launching an assault from the Strait is completely retarded. We're lookin' at underwater mine fields and torpedo submarines.
teh.frickin.pope said:TARDIS said:Dat necro. But I'd have to agree, launching an assault from the Strait is completely retarded. We're lookin' at underwater mine fields and torpedo submarines.
Not to mention their super advanced flying boats!
Rifleman said:
Jhessail said:My whole point was that your idea of an amphibious invasion of Iran is completely ludicrous when US has bases in Iraq, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Turkey - all countries surrounding Iran from every direction. Because we also know that deserts are nothing to the might of the US Logistics Corps - after Desert Storm 1 and 2 - why do you think Pentagon generals would risk committing into the single most complicated and challenging operation known to military when they can launch a four-pronged conventional land invasion, augmented by air-mobile operations if necessary? No sane reason, of course. Hence my argument that your peanut-sized brain is overloaded with Modern Warfare or Saving Private Ryan or other similar bull****.
Jhessail said:My whole point was that your idea of an amphibious invasion of Iran is completely ludicrous when US has bases in Iraq, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Turkey - all countries surrounding Iran from every direction. Because we also know that deserts are nothing to the might of the US Logistics Corps - after Desert Storm 1 and 2 - why do you think Pentagon generals would risk committing into the single most complicated and challenging operation known to military when they can launch a four-pronged conventional land invasion, augmented by air-mobile operations if necessary? No sane reason, of course. Hence my argument that your peanut-sized brain is overloaded with Modern Warfare or Saving Private Ryan or other similar bull****.
You are a completely clueless idiot and I sincerely hope that your post was made in jest. If not, and you were actually serious, I pity your teachers and hope that you're 12-year old.Agovic said:But Iran has Syria, Russia, China and the rest of the kinda-Communist countries supporting it, including Cuba and Venezuela, who are dangerously close to the US, and we know what happened in the early 60'ies
AWdeV said:Jhess; just stick to the "Agovic being a completely clueless idiot". It works perfectly. He's a montenegrin nationalist for crying out loud.