Whilst Hitler had family ties and friends in England, the only resources he got was foolish appeasement.InfernoOfAbyss said:Oh I suppose you think, Hitler created the most powerful army with the latest technology in fully devastated, occupied country by chance? Or the word "England " is repeated in Mein Kampf many times, by chance? America and Britain have lost a tiny amount of people compared to the USSR, and in fact went to war only in 1944, by chance? Facts can be listed for a long time.
Kobrag said:USSR had more casualties due to the ****ty tactics and lack of arms, not in the least caused by Stalin's purge of the upper echelons of Army Leadership. *cough *
Kobrag said:Whilst Hitler had family ties and friends in England, the only resources he got was foolish appeasement.
USSR had more casualties due to the ****ty tactics and lack of arms, not in the least caused by Stalin's purge of the upper echelons of Army Leadership. *cough *
If anything, Frances ruthless terms in the treaty was the direct cause of WWII.
InfernoOfAbyss said:Amusing present when Hitler came to power, no army, no technology, but are afraid of him and try to appease.
With money or without money?Tiberius Decimus Maximus said:Interesting what you can do in 6-7 years, huh? But then interesting what you can do in 5 years in the Soviet Union as well.
Kobrag said:Again the Treatywas mostly influenced by the french.
And Hitler relied on communal and forced labour to rebuild Germany and run it;s numerous facotries.
Your accusations are an insult to those who fought and died.
Besides, what gains could Britain have had from a strong German empire?
Tuckles said:I don't know how you can have an argument with this guy. I can't even understand what he's saying.