That's just in bad taste dude.
Honestly... World war F@#$ing 5 will rage before L'aigle..dinnerblaster said:I don't mean to be nitpicky, because that's against my nature, but I just can't let this joke pass by.
"I bet we get world war 3 sooner than L'Aigle."
I just hope Doc's island isn't strategically too important when the bombs fall. Being myself a Finn, gotta just love to have Russia so near
RanGer_SLO said:You know, some consider the Napoleonic Wars as a World War. Also, the Seven Years War.
jacobhinds said:Same could be said for ww1, the majority of the fighting was contained in the same regions as the Napoleonic wars.
nilloc93 said:RanGer_SLO said:You know, some consider the Napoleonic Wars as a World War. Also, the Seven Years War.
Seven years was a world war
Napoleonic really did not leave Europe on any major scale (African campaign aside)
Yep, agreed. Perhaps not on the same scale as the two World Wars but still on a large-scale nonetheless.Landgraft said:nilloc93 said:RanGer_SLO said:You know, some consider the Napoleonic Wars as a World War. Also, the Seven Years War.
Seven years was a world war
Napoleonic really did not leave Europe on any major scale (African campaign aside)
British invasion of Argentina, war of 1812, skirmishes in New Zealand, French/British/Spanish/Dutch fighting in the East and West Indies, revolts in India that were backed by the French, fighting in the middle East...
Feels like a world war to me.
Landgraft said:nilloc93 said:RanGer_SLO said:You know, some consider the Napoleonic Wars as a World War. Also, the Seven Years War.
Seven years was a world war
Napoleonic really did not leave Europe on any major scale (African campaign aside)
British invasion of Argentina, war of 1812, skirmishes in New Zealand, French/British/Spanish/Dutch fighting in the East and West Indies, revolts in India that were backed by the French, fighting in the middle East...
Feels like a world war to me.
Wranger said:I've read serious historians referring to the two world wars as one world war with a 21 year armistice in between.
Just because there weren't nazis in ww1 that doesn't mean that those were two different wars, for example, at the start of ww1 there were no commies, but in he end of it Russia was communist.GERRY said:Wranger said:I've read serious historians referring to the two world wars as one world war with a 21 year armistice in between.
There were Nazis in ww1? Wow never knew
If they reason that with the fact that there still was hate and hostility after ww1 between the major nations you could also say that the world war took place over 65 years because the hostility between Germany and France wasnt gone after the franco prussian war too! Or you could say that the Napoleonic wars were also a part of the world war which ended in 1945 because they caused the franco prussian implicitly. Europe was always a place where the major nations struggleda about political and military power. So you cant say that ww1 and ww2 was just "one war" in my opinion.
Sorry for the novel.
GERRY said:Wranger said:I've read serious historians referring to the two world wars as one world war with a 21 year armistice in between.
There were Nazis in ww1? Wow never knew
If they reason that with the fact that there still was hate and hostility after ww1 between the major nations you could also say that the world war took place over 65 years because the hostility between Germany and France wasnt gone after the franco prussian war too! Or you could say that the Napoleonic wars were also a part of the world war which ended in 1945 because they caused the franco prussian implicitly. Europe was always a place where the major nations struggleda about political and military power. So you cant say that ww1 and ww2 was just "one war" in my opinion.
Sorry for the novel.
Basically every war since the Napoleonic Wars has directly affected the world in some way.Willhelm said:GERRY said:Wranger said:I've read serious historians referring to the two world wars as one world war with a 21 year armistice in between.
There were Nazis in ww1? Wow never knew
If they reason that with the fact that there still was hate and hostility after ww1 between the major nations you could also say that the world war took place over 65 years because the hostility between Germany and France wasnt gone after the franco prussian war too! Or you could say that the Napoleonic wars were also a part of the world war which ended in 1945 because they caused the franco prussian implicitly. Europe was always a place where the major nations struggleda about political and military power. So you cant say that ww1 and ww2 was just "one war" in my opinion.
Sorry for the novel.
All those conflicts are linked and each one inadvertently led to the next.
Technically, HItler got many of his opinions that formed the Nazi party during WW1.GERRY said:Wranger said:I've read serious historians referring to the two world wars as one world war with a 21 year armistice in between.
There were Nazis in ww1? Wow never knew