diessa
Sergeant at Arms
GlorvalhirSRB said:But seriously people, what are you talking about ?
Is this some kind of "we're gonna talk so much about it that they have to listen to us" secret agreement
I think game developer's policies toward their consumer-producers is an interesting topic, so I talk about it because I feel like it. However, considering the Mount & Blade series' relationship with modifications (i.e., they are critical), it is appropriate that the topic would come up. The most recent comment in this thread came from MadVader, a person responsible for one of the largest, most popular modifications. The discussion isn't binding, but it isn't ridiculous, either. Like many things in this somewhat-of-a-threadnought, it is simply one of the many things being discussed at a given time.
Edit: I think a theme in this thread has been that you can criticize something you love. There are some cynics, and they are some idealists; however, fans, consumers, and consumer-producers can provide feedback–some of which is critical–while being supporting of the developer's efforts. Does it matter what they think? Yes and no. This thread won't change history, but Taleworlds has demonstrated that it is sensitive to feedback; what people say matters here.