I don't think you can properly judge if its valid or not since you have not been looking at neither my feedback(or from other players who have been supportive & constructive since minute 1) nor their reaction or lack of it, summed up to that their recent discussions and responses to other topics that we already had answers to.
You can be angry and still provide constructive criticism and feedback the same way I keep doing despite my saltyness since yesterday hope you understand that.
I dont need to judge wether your critisim is valid or not- the devs do. Honestly the work you put into it is commendable and the contents of it are helpful bug reports and suggestions. But the way we as humans work, you, me, the devs, anyone, is that when someone tells them they did something wrong (which is what we do when we critizise) in a matter and tone thats not carefuly picked they are not going to see the points however valid they may be, they see a guy being angry at them. Disliking the work they have spend the last several years on.
For "No Mans Sky" they had a single guy deal with all critisism after they launched and forbid all other devs from reading them. That was the only way for them to compile peoples reaction into useful data without the devs and their work being influenced by the amount and nature of critisism they received.
I dont know how TW handels this but I would assume they dont have the devs individualy read through all the complaints, critiques and suggestions but rather have someone do it for them and put it into useful data. They said they are reading it. I wouldnt expect the poor guy who has to compile all the information to write a in-depth reply to every suggestion posted.