Opinion Poll

Should TW remove the 12 player or draw feature so we can just play the game Yes/No


  • Total voters
    31

Users who are viewing this thread

The problem is the execution, not the concept.

Ranked (in theory) means games are higher quality and the devs are able to balance the game better, which is good for any game.

The playerbase size could be called a problem, but as we've seen in pickups, even with 24 players and just 2 lobbies, splitting into a higher and lower tier lobbies means both are more fun for everyone involved.
 
I welcome the ranking system and look forward to it being more fleshed out and working. The teams in public skirmish were just too often way too unbalanced. Not fun for anybody.
 
The problem is the execution, not the concept.

Ranked (in theory) means games are higher quality and the devs are able to balance the game better, which is good for any game.

The playerbase size could be called a problem, but as we've seen in pickups, even with 24 players and just 2 lobbies, splitting into a higher and lower tier lobbies means both are more fun for everyone involved.
I believe the ranking system might be too complicated. A simplified approach with less ranks would make much more sense to me.
Making the ranking system too transparent is never a good idea, it just enables exploiters to grasp it alot more easily.
Also, leaving loop holes in the ranking / placement ... I didnt expect anything else from our core community to find and use the exploits immediately. :party:
 
The problem is the execution, not the concept.

Ranked (in theory) means games are higher quality and the devs are able to balance the game better, which is good for any game.

The playerbase size could be called a problem, but as we've seen in pickups, even with 24 players and just 2 lobbies, splitting into a higher and lower tier lobbies means both are more fun for everyone involved.
Feck no, the concept is a problem! XD this isn't League of Legends, we don't need forced competition, and we need to be able to play the game. There is no benifit to constantly being unable to play a match because of fewer people then 12
 
Feck no, the concept is a problem! XD this isn't League of Legends, we don't need forced competition, and we need to be able to play the game. There is no benifit to constantly being unable to play a match because of fewer people then 12
You are wrong... The skill gap in skirmish is huge, even within the competitive community. Balanced matches are more fun for everyone, so why not having a system in place that enables balanced matches? Given it would work of course.
 
You are wrong... The skill gap in skirmish is huge, even within the competitive community. Balanced matches are more fun for everyone, so why not having a system in place that enables balanced matches? Given it would work of course.
Skrimish mate I don't even play skirmish, people canna start matches right now in either skrim or captian, this feature isnt balancing, I just want to be able to play the game! Forcing everyone into ranked matches requiring 12 people is bloody killing the game right now. You could do competing better if they'd just release private servers already.
 
Last edited:
Feck no, the concept is a problem! XD this isn't League of Legends, we don't need forced competition, and we need to be able to play the game. There is no benifit to constantly being unable to play a match because of fewer people then 12
That's not how the system works. It makes 3v3s or 4v4s if there are not 12 players available.

There's no PvP game where putting players with 1000s of hours against brand new players is an enjoyable experience for the new players.
 
That's not how the system works. It makes 3v3s or 4v4s if there are not 12 players available.

There's no PvP game where putting players with 1000s of hours against brand new players is an enjoyable experience for the new players.
letting ya know yesterday it was'nt, today it is happily, thousands of hours though...? Bannerlord isnt even 3 yet.
 
Back
Top Bottom