UNAC Power Rankings Discussion
- Thread starter Rhade
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
Eternal said:
lol
Haha sorry but I just thought it was funny how you mention that a team has weak cav and then you proceed to mention my name.
so arrogant ~
Eternal said:
RobertBruce
Sergeant
That's funny I thought Shema was really good cav. I kept getting raped by him just like Scott Ray and Cal do to me 
Mok the International
Banned
Inb4theysayIsuckEUdickUnicorn said:
But...lol. Shema, is very, very good cav, much like Scott Ray. And he has to deal with 100+ ping. GA also has Peter, very skilled cav, like Cal.
I see how you can get that impression with Peter being absent the last two matches and having a lack of dedicated cavalry, but I'm sure your opinion of that will change during the tournaments course.
Actually really curious now, who plays cavalry for Wappaw and afaik only Scott ray is a figure in Balion
Unicorn said:
Actually really curious now, who plays cavalry for Wappaw and afaik only Scott ray is a figure in Balion
Agreed. It's week 4, and I typed that up before some week 4 matches were done. I also don't watch every single stream, although I do watch many of them, and I don't come from a background of winning everything. I also don't consider myself a great player in terms of skill.
I wouldn't be surprised if my opinion changes and Balions practices their infantry and gets better, or GA coordinates better with their cav and overcomes their ping. Hell, I was already proven wrong in my analysis of Rebels - vs. GKR they definitely got themselves together and played a lot better than they did before.
It's difficult to judge teams at the beginning of a long tournament, because a lot can change. WMT is getting much better with every game, and other teams are working out their difficulties. It is entirely possible for a team I currently have at places 1-5 to drop down to like 8. It's merely subjective opinion backed up by objective facts from what I have seen so far. It's not something to get butthurt about, because every team has weaknesses and things to work on.
I wouldn't be surprised if my opinion changes and Balions practices their infantry and gets better, or GA coordinates better with their cav and overcomes their ping. Hell, I was already proven wrong in my analysis of Rebels - vs. GKR they definitely got themselves together and played a lot better than they did before.
It's difficult to judge teams at the beginning of a long tournament, because a lot can change. WMT is getting much better with every game, and other teams are working out their difficulties. It is entirely possible for a team I currently have at places 1-5 to drop down to like 8. It's merely subjective opinion backed up by objective facts from what I have seen so far. It's not something to get butthurt about, because every team has weaknesses and things to work on.
In with Shema here
Catholic must be high, drunk, tired or all three. Can't say that Bestcav_UK isn't powerful or that Bestcav_Sca is bad, I'm sure that Trebron will have something to say about that. Shema is a str0nk cavalry, trust me I've actually played with him and against him, his only downside is that he cheats at EU3. You're talking out of your arse.
Eternal said:
Catholic must be high, drunk, tired or all three. Can't say that Bestcav_UK isn't powerful or that Bestcav_Sca is bad, I'm sure that Trebron will have something to say about that. Shema is a str0nk cavalry, trust me I've actually played with him and against him, his only downside is that he cheats at EU3. You're talking out of your arse.
