Comrade Temuzu said:
Weaver said:
Let's see, some garbage sources, some twisting legit information, some lying and drawing fallacious conclusions.
Let's see, some burden of proof, some appeal to hypocrisy, some fallacy of virtue and overall a bad rebuttal.
1/10 there was an attempt.
Wait, you're making a ****post and burden of proof is on
me? Are you retarded?
It was a trick question. Of course you are.
But I'll humour you just this once.
First source - some obscure twitter account with a DNR flag for an avatar. The author, some nutjob in Toronto, is reporting the terrorists capturing two battalions worth of tanks, buttload of artillery and APCs and
500 tons of ammo.
And that's after claiming for months that UAF in Debaltsevo have long ago ran out ammo, food and whatnot because they're completely encircled and forsaken. Making fools out of themselves again.
Bull****-meter exploding.
No proof provided either, of course. But what did I expect?
Next source - some gruesome images from a battlefield. Which proves there was battle. Useless.
Next - a video of a platoon surrendering. Of course it's thrown in to draw a fallacious conclusion that all Ukrainian soldiers refuse to fight. Basic propaganda move. Denied.
Next - a dude falling from a tank while being recorded by a host of journalists. I don't even know what it is supposed to mean.
Next - an article which is actually not full of **** despite being on a Russian resource. But all these talks only show that Debaltsevo was not fully encircled if almost 2k people managed to pull out in one day.
The last article concentrates on basic human incompetence but it's nothing new. Unlike Russian army, UAF has almost no combat experience.
All in all, your posts are mostly just collages of gruesome images and baseless reports from biased nobodies. Rare legit articles thrown in the mix are taken out of context and cherry-picked. Of course, I realize you did not compile that yourself. Still blame is on you for being such a tool and passing this mash on us.
