Zorion_no
Sergeant
did you bother really reading what I' chimeing about - we the players shouldnt have to be forced to 1 specific playstyle just to counter 1 of the factions on the map.Or maybe they want to make the game realistic.
I chased down about 20 different Khuzait war parties just last night(some of them smaller than me), while using a Battanian party consisting of 20 archers, 2o infantry, and about 40 cavalry.
If you want to catch Khuzait on the map, maybe you should recruit a faster army instead of trying to make the developers change something that's true to history and completely realistic.
Besides its besides the point - ai lords cant pick their fights like we can either vs them.
As for the historical part - again then they should have a severe penalty to sieges, not being able to build siege engines etc.
As others point out there is a balance between "fun" and historical. This is as others point out not "Khuziait Invasion".
And I personally have no problems dealing with them - didnt you bother reading the part about me "fixing" the snowball issue by going to NE their starting faction war - and by this halt their progress.
The problem is that if I dont go to active deal with them like that, they will own 30-50% of the NE within 100 days.
1-2 holdings of Aserai.
1-2 Holdings of SE.
1-2 Holdings of Sturgia.
Or more.
This isnt good gameplay mechanics when 1 force can be so dominant over "all other factions".
And unless the player deals with it, then its full steam ahead.
Still not sure if Khuzait defenders are trolling or fanbois og legit just dont see/get what we others who cry for a balance.
Anyways this discussion is a dead-end at this point as changes are comeing in 1.56 so we will see how that goes.