- Best answers
please don't add open plains, still have horrible nightmares about it from UNAC
Well I personally am of the opinion that if there are more new maps that are of equal merit to Ruins, Verloren, Vendetta, Sandiboush, Frosty Battle, and Reveran Village, then they should also be replaced. That's probably not all the admins, just me though. However, considering how difficult it is to find a replacement for one map, I don't think it's a good idea to throw out the entire map pool in hopes of replacing it. Of all the maps in the pool, 2 were original Native Maps (FbtR and Ruins), so they were the oldest and most played.Balion Zero said:@X
First thing bring up my suggestion of Open Plains, you have access to servers that contain it to show the admins.
Now not trying to promote a discussion here but saying :
Could the same not be said about Ruins, Verloren, Vendetta, San'di'boush, Frosty Battle, Reveran Village ? I mean all these maps have been played very extensively I am sure in both the NA and EU community. Its quiet obvious that mostly 3 strats maybe 4 are the ones that are always used. So it can be said that they have been exhausted as well. I wont touch on the subject of if FbTR is balanced or not because that will probably spin out into something bigger then it has to be. But thank you for the official stand point on it, but I just think a better wording or reasoning on why its being considered to be removed would be better. Saying its exhausted really isn't a real reason in my opinion. Better off just saying that majority of the admins dont like it and dont want it in the tournament.Mr.X said:Field By The River has been played so long that it's basically been exhausted.
I'll look into that, thanksSir Marek said:Once when all maps will be known, I would appreciate, if admin team or whoever post entire list of flag spawns, wherein flags are bugged to prevent an accident (e.g. match Bohemian vs. Renegades on the Frosty battle).I reckon a lot of players know all of them already, but not such a big number in my humble opinion.http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,289393.15.html
For me it's personal preference. I don't think it's unbalanced but it is really boring imo.CalamityuP said:
FYI - most of the time Routing isn't controlled by the server, and there is no way of telling how good a connection will be without testing it from every location (not very easy). Jest is one of the few server providers to show evidence of thorough testing before selecting a data centre to host his servers, if you want to pay for a server from Jest I'm sure the admins will accept it as an official server.Arthasan said:I agree with SotaMursu. You chose servers with bad routing, what's typical for cheap servers. It means some people connect with the server via lagged 'roads'. I have got 75 (ALWAYS, ACCURATELY 75!) ping on WNLs. When I have been using some utility to change the routing, it was 55. However, I can't do it now, because it was trial version
I am sorry I thought this was Nations Cup not European Cup. He was merely stating that it can be played different ways, if you don't know how to play it effectively with other tactics. Unfortunate, but it can be played effectively in many other ways then the ones you stated.m1tchell23 said:this isn't NA though