Talking nonsense while complaining about nonsense. We have reached the beyond
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Multiplayer is dying.
- Thread starter Yukmouth++
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
I don't know about Skirmish in NA or OCE. But in EU servers, Skirmish is far from dead. I always find a match in less than 1 minute.
And as far as siege goes, I still don't see how siege is dead. You just have to wait the first time, and then you can keep joining because the server just restarts.
And as far as siege goes, I still don't see how siege is dead. You just have to wait the first time, and then you can keep joining because the server just restarts.
This, I play almost daily on EU and never had a problem to get a match.
Kids only.
Bro, I was waiting in Siege for 40 minutes last night around 9:00pm The match making of NASiege isn't working. I shouldn't have to play with 250 ping on OC Sieg server. Or whatever region that is. I went there last night, and half the team was NA. That is bull****. People are so desparte for Siege They are playing with a severe handicap.
KSHMR is right, there is 0 problem with multiplayer, ask the 30 players that are queuing for siege during NA prime time, on a freshly released game, followed by many gamers during a time of forced quarantine. 30 players queueing for siege shows that its a massive success.
Last edited:
75 players queuing for siege right now in EU.
Nothing happens.
Did they break again the matchmaking ?
Nothing happens.
Did they break again the matchmaking ?
Hello, how long did it take to open a game after it passed 60 players?
and what happens if you miss the "queue" when it restarts? now you have to wait even more time for that ONE siege game to finish because you cant join mid game...
maybe if we had a dedicated siege server we could join when one person leaves instead of waiting for a whole game to finish and praying to the queue gods they will let us in to the one or 2 siege games in rotation.
Hi.
I'd say at least 10 minutes.
Also, the game just crashed on the very last point, during said game.
Where?
in the serverbrowser
Please look at the thread I linked earlier in this thread. It is really easy to access, just a matter of viewing the thread and getting the password from Callum's post.
Styo made a fair point actually. Speaking for myself, I don't mind playing on a siege server that is let's say 60 or 70% populated.
The main point is that if they were to list that siege server in the server browser, more people would join over time because you don't have to wait. Like I mentioned, the first time you queue for siege, it can be that you have to wait for roughly 10 or 20 minutes (potentially more depending on crashes etc.).
If you take all of this into consideration, the best strategy for the developers is to simply list these servers in server browser and let people play more instead of having to wait moderately long waiting times.
The main point is that if they were to list that siege server in the server browser, more people would join over time because you don't have to wait. Like I mentioned, the first time you queue for siege, it can be that you have to wait for roughly 10 or 20 minutes (potentially more depending on crashes etc.).
If you take all of this into consideration, the best strategy for the developers is to simply list these servers in server browser and let people play more instead of having to wait moderately long waiting times.
Acknowledge our damn opinions on the class system.
What's the point of this comment? Azakhi works on servers. Why would he acknowledge anything to do with the class system?
I am all for hearing what the developers have to say and criticizing the game, but leaving dumb comments like these are why they don't want to comment or say anything in the first place.
Wouldn't say it if it wasn't constantly dodged.
