Blead said:
You do know they do that in real life also? Well most do.
[IG] Guard of Istiniar - A clan for Mount&Blade Warband {Closed}
- Thread starter SCGavin
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
You do know they do that in real life also? Well most do.
Aeronwen said:
I wanted to be a little kiddo forevaH ! Stupid life.
TurambarMakart said:Aeronwen said:
I wanted to be a little kiddo forevaH ! Stupid life.
You are, trust me.
+1yourNotAlone said:TurambarMakart said:
I wanted to be a little kiddo forevaH ! Stupid life.
You are, trust me.
The age where Tura's cognitive development stopped.
ryozu said:+1yourNotAlone said:TurambarMakart said:
I wanted to be a little kiddo forevaH ! Stupid life.
You are, trust me.
The age where Tura's cognitive development stopped.
( that baby is not italian at all, bloody fake spanish people faking to be a proper italian fella )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drvHvC_zn6Y
( he is and he is AWESOME and listening to proper music )
Meister_Eder
Knight at Arms
Dear visitors on IG:BG,
since there have been discussions on "ranger spam" for ages, and the issue came up again recently, we decided to test whether restricting the ranger class would improve the game experience on our server.
The test will run for one week, until Wednesday 6/2/13
After that the settings will be set to default in any case
Rangers will be restricted to a maximum of 10 per team.
What we are aiming for is not a perfect balance of classes and this test doesn't portray any official standpoint towards the "archerspam" or "archers are OP" debates. But, since with very high numbers of players, many seem to chose the ranger class and huge groups of rangers seem to be very effective against uncoordinated teams and are not much fun to play against for most people, we want to cut the very extreme archer spam on a full server. The restrictions will therefore only be noticeable if there are more than 20 people on Battlegrounds.
After the test week, we want to evaluate the feedback and we will then decide, if restricted rangers become a permanent setting on the server.
We therefore would appreciate if you post your thoughts in this thread or in the respective thread on our forum.
since there have been discussions on "ranger spam" for ages, and the issue came up again recently, we decided to test whether restricting the ranger class would improve the game experience on our server.
The test will run for one week, until Wednesday 6/2/13
After that the settings will be set to default in any case
Rangers will be restricted to a maximum of 10 per team.
What we are aiming for is not a perfect balance of classes and this test doesn't portray any official standpoint towards the "archerspam" or "archers are OP" debates. But, since with very high numbers of players, many seem to chose the ranger class and huge groups of rangers seem to be very effective against uncoordinated teams and are not much fun to play against for most people, we want to cut the very extreme archer spam on a full server. The restrictions will therefore only be noticeable if there are more than 20 people on Battlegrounds.
After the test week, we want to evaluate the feedback and we will then decide, if restricted rangers become a permanent setting on the server.
We therefore would appreciate if you post your thoughts in this thread or in the respective thread on our forum.
Max 10 is pretty fine with me actually.
Finally !
Thanks and let's see how this will work out.
Thanks and let's see how this will work out.
I hope, Archivist and Cristo will return to the BG in the light of this.
Quality. Will be interested to see how this pans out, might make Nord Town a fun map again.
http://chickenonaraft.com/
Meister_Eder said:
Having the people who run the server takes things slightly less seriously all the time would help. Having 5 IG's in a ruin with crossbows is hardly going to make anyone else do much other than join them or die. Other such measures of delaying a round can be listed, but really take a note from Muricah, charge in balls first and get a good melee going, rather than trying to scrim vs. random pubs.
can't you make it a percentage, just been playing with about 15 on each side, 10 archers... seems the same archer spam you guys are on about.
It's hard for me to say such a thing but ... i agree with Mitchell ...
10 archers max per team means nothing, a percentage of the team would be far more interesting.
why not something like 50% of the team max ? ( imo it is not enough but it may be a good start )
But anyway, that's already a good new !
10 archers max per team means nothing, a percentage of the team would be far more interesting.
why not something like 50% of the team max ? ( imo it is not enough but it may be a good start )
But anyway, that's already a good new !
<3 BFF
Meister_Eder
Knight at Arms
To my knowledge, percentage is not possible with the current ENL admin tools.m1tchell23 said:
Great steps has been taken, in the general direction of not getting turned into a hedgehog!
Thank you men for you actions!
Thank you men for you actions!
In 25 vs 25 rounds it would mean a restriction of 12 per team. It is more, than 10 we have nowAsgeir said:
