But sill,he´s dead,good thing for enemies and bad thing for allies.MorrisB said:That's just how this game works, deal with it. Consider it as if every culture in Calradia would agree that killing a king is the least honorable thing in the world. Either that, or: his allies are pissed because you killed a friend of theirs, and his enemies are pissed because they wanted to kill him personally and you just took away this chance. Or they are angry because the balance of power will be disorted. This is a medieval world where kings are important. Even in real history, it was very rare that someone tried to kill a ruler in battle. Rather, they tried to capture the guy to use him for political schemes (demand high ransom, blackmail his relatives who rule certain fiefs, whatever).
Understood.My question has been answered.King Loras said:It's the Middle Ages. When you kill one King, all the other Kings and nobles start thinking to themselves "If he dares to kill a King, maybe he would dare to kill me too" and inevitably they hate you. I think it's perfectly realistic. The concept of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" does not exist yet. If you kill my enemy, that doesn't make you my friend. It just makes you dangerous. That's the mentality of a feudal lord.
Edit: Also, keep in mind that how a man dies is very important to feudal lords, and also the distinction between different types of people. If you hang a lord, or kill him when he is defenseless, everyone hates you, but if you kill him in battle, you may be praised for your battle prowess. On the other hand, nothing is wrong with hanging a peasant. How people thought of these things 800 years ago is completely different from how we think of 'em today. It's an alien world.
Arch said:I agree, I never do it.
Archevious said:Avoir!
Archevious said:That means "Bye" In french.