in that era Turks were the best, your story is a fantasyFinzi said:In 1480, the Knights defended their fortress-capital of Rhodes against a Turkish force of 70,000+ soldiers, including artillery. With only 3,500 men they managed to defeat their enemies.
Isn't this thread on Historical Medieval Heroes?Kataphraktos said:in that era Turks were the best, your story is a fantasyFinzi said:In 1480, the Knights defended their fortress-capital of Rhodes against a Turkish force of 70,000+ soldiers, including artillery. With only 3,500 men they managed to defeat their enemies.
Umar ibn al-Khattāb and Khalid ibn al-Walid are my favourite historical heroes
thick1988 said:Edward the Black Prince of Wales.
Kataphraktos said:in that era Turks were the best, your story is a fantasyFinzi said:In 1480, the Knights defended their fortress-capital of Rhodes against a Turkish force of 70,000+ soldiers, including artillery. With only 3,500 men they managed to defeat their enemies.
Umar ibn al-Khattāb and Khalid ibn al-Walid are my favourite historical heroes
Probably the epitome of what a soldier should be.Destichado said:Pierre Terrail, seigneur de Bayard "le bon chevalier"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Terrail,_seigneur_de_Bayard
Among his many exploits, he single-handedly defended the bridge over the Garigliano against 200 Spaniards. But because he's French, no one hears about him.
The French weren't always like they are now.
The French weren't always like they are now.
chazix said:so what if all the nobles spock french.i hate them as well for thining they to good for english.
Um are you retarded? That very much happened. And they also defended Malta against far superior Turkish forces, too.Kataphraktos said:in that era Turks were the best, your story is a fantasyFinzi said:In 1480, the Knights defended their fortress-capital of Rhodes against a Turkish force of 70,000+ soldiers, including artillery. With only 3,500 men they managed to defeat their enemies.