- Thread starter DarkLight
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
Zoyka said:
Just a few corrections:
- Only Gibby claims DarkLight has used auto block in the past, not Arni.
- Gibby could be wrong with those claims. #xbowsdontgothroughboardshields #gibgamegibster
- If those claims are true, he used them in unofficial ft7s on the Ludus, where his punishment is decided by the Ludus administration only.
- Sota was banned from the tournament due to the rule set, but never shamed or put away as a cheater.
- Sota didn't get banned from the forums for pink javelins, but for
Sota got banned for being sota, a decision we can all agree with (including sota).
Just have Darklight record his next duels with Nohboard and everything will be cleared up, surely if hes innocent he wont mind proving it to fully clear his name, since so many still believe hes cheating. Free softwares, I'll gladly provide links.
Absence of proof does not mean proof of absence.
Absence of proof does not mean proof of absence.
Watly said:
This is not a claim, it's totally undeniable that he did it. I'll be clear: I have done many ft7s with Darklight and I know exactly what he is capable of and what he cannot handle. His blocking was blatantly abnormally fast and he was able to handle tech which usually would result in a 7 - 1 or 7 - 0 win for me. There is no ambiguity about this; the ft7 I refer to was in September last year, Darklight even now is not capable of blocking close to the level he could in that ft7 and this was proven in my tournament ft7 with him. Frankly Darklight is not able to handle complex inverse moves, which Sponge has plenty of, however Arni is right that Darklight's blocking was not instant in all cases in his duel with Sponge. I don't think there's enough evidence to punish Darklight. If I were Sponge I would have tested his reactive-blocking during the ft7 to see if he was using autoblock but since this wasn't done nobody can say for sure either way.
Lol in that case every autoblocker which waits a bit longer than taps the button would be hardly detected since you can make them delays by yourself, so main indicator of autoblock is constant downblocks on awkward situations, like if someone feints a lot and suddenly stops the guy with autoblock will keep tap the button and in the end he will tap and it will block down since there is no attack direction to follow, if way too many of those awkward situations happen yeah to me is obvious autoblocker. Yeah i do agree that preblocking stabs is good, but common preblocking stabs against a guy who has stabed 2-3 times for 20 mins duels,normaly you adapt to enemies style. Ive fought a lot against darklight, and i would say i never seen him block down that much and make a lot of akward moments.
S_ said:
Basically this. A person which was playing without autoblock before, and has developed muscle memory will not just hold the block button, he will mostly use it the same way as he would without it, he will even move his screen to the sides, because it is muscle memory, it's fixed in his brain, in his hands. So no, I do not believe that every autoblocker has to do instant blocks.
Shemaforash said:
Pre-blocking stabs is a really easy method of stun-slashing any stab from any stab capable weapon in the game if you're using a fast enough, especially 1h weapon. As someone who flips a lot between inverse and normal (I learned both and switch constantly), it is probably even more valid against people using attack by normal mouse direction as repeated stabs don't require camera recovery on normal and will generally be faster than that of an inverse stab which has to contend with a thinning and eventually terminating hitbox that goes along with their natural upward camera movement.
Shemaforash said:
this man is a clear auto blocker troll. look how he does not capitalize any letters in his post. he even puts ae tags on haha what a troll dude
It is very nice of gibby to admit that it is "undeniable" that darklight is an autoblocker. At least Darklight understands how stupid he would look if he tried to argue with gibby. I am really surprised that nobody minds or cares that well known cheater autoblocker now hosts main duel tournament. I am not surprised though that gibby didnt ban darklight on ludus. Wouldnt expect any better admin judgment from the only guy since 2010 who got thrown out from adminship in the WPL. 
Zoyka said:It is very nice of gibby to admit that it is "undeniable" that darklight is an autoblocker. At least Darklight understands how stupid he would look if he tried to argue with gibby. I am really surprised that nobody minds or cares that well known cheater autoblocker now hosts main duel tournament. I am not surprised though that gibby didnt ban darklight on ludus. Wouldnt expect any better admin judgment from the only guy since 2010 who got thrown out from adminship in the WPL.
- Status
