-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
cRPG has only a week and already killed Vanilla
- Thread starter Goyyyio
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
yeah, no. people will play whats new, always been like that.
No, i will use this chance despite not being interested in cRPG to attack taleworlds
The problem with yours was that it was getting a publicity of being "a better mp" and there are many people working on server side. They are obviously upset that you kind of steal all the credit. I mean issues are mostly design issues, there are many other people. Devs, artists etc. that did their job well but all gone to kind of waste due to those community server people advertising their changes as "better mp".
The problem with yours was that it was getting a publicity of being "a better mp" and there are many people working on server side. They are obviously upset that you kind of steal all the credit. I mean issues are mostly design issues, there are many other people. Devs, artists etc. that did their job well but all gone to kind of waste due to those community server people advertising their changes as "better mp".
Alboin
Sergeant Knight at Arms
Yes.
Not yet.
Goyyyio
Sergeant
Nope, not the same thing, not even close to being the same thing. Bannerlord Online's playerbase is from singleplayer, not multiplayer, and the experience is entirely different. BO is an MMO that emulates SP experience with other players, cRPG is a Multiplayer Plus, and cRPG already has a team of experienced devs that made it first in Warband and it was already popular, even better than playing vanilla. cRPG is here to stay and it's not something "new", it has been out there for years, and BO is still being played too, it has a good regular playerbase that enjoys that slow paced, not skill focused experience
Last edited:
i think persistent world is no.1 for warband.btw Crpg great2 for long time agos
Implying that would even go the right way
Alkix
Regular
CRPG is fun, and I loved the gear customization and skill point allocation, but "play to win" mechanics can become tedious if not managed correctly. Vanilla MP has a point with class selection and perk selection: There's going to be a meta and there's going to be crappy configurations that don't work, so let's just not have them.
CRPG has a point: customizing gear is super fun, looks cool, and sometimes running around without clothes and a crossbow is hilarious.
CRPG has a point: customizing gear is super fun, looks cool, and sometimes running around without clothes and a crossbow is hilarious.
CRPG mp design is elegant. not many ppl realize that RPGs levelling system provides a basic referencing data for team balancing a long time ago. it's not only for "play to win".
BTW, No surprise Vanilla MP is bad...
When I was talking about CRPG, Vanilla ppl still arguing that "big group battles will make each game time-consuming" kind of thing...
Every single topic about MP here already existed a long time before (in M&B1 multiplayer mode), and has many conclusions... ---- Why are we still bringing up those old resolved topics? because MP designers are not M&B1 players! They are still making the same mistakes made by another dev group years ago.
CRPG did the same. made mistakes, then fixed them. What we see here is an over 5 years improved product. It's already a mature blueprint, just waiting for implementation. And with a better graphic. So it's not a new product at all.
(sry can't remember the exact year number, but thanks for Taleworlds great fundamental too)
BTW, No surprise Vanilla MP is bad...
When I was talking about CRPG, Vanilla ppl still arguing that "big group battles will make each game time-consuming" kind of thing...
Every single topic about MP here already existed a long time before (in M&B1 multiplayer mode), and has many conclusions... ---- Why are we still bringing up those old resolved topics? because MP designers are not M&B1 players! They are still making the same mistakes made by another dev group years ago.
CRPG did the same. made mistakes, then fixed them. What we see here is an over 5 years improved product. It's already a mature blueprint, just waiting for implementation. And with a better graphic. So it's not a new product at all.
(sry can't remember the exact year number, but thanks for Taleworlds great fundamental too)
yup, and if they do it the same way they did for warband, they likely won't keep most of their players around, either.
Similar threads
