I hate to have to report things like this as NapoleonicWars has only been out for a few days. However, I don't think that excuses this kind of behaviour on a public server.
Background:
Firstly, this was on the EU_2 server.
After playing a number of rounds with a couple of friends, I had absolutely no complaints. However, at the start of just another round, a friend and I went artillery, after several minutes a "6e_Art_Captain_Atilla" decided that the cannon we were using was "his cannon". After continuing to use the cannon, since it was infact the cannon we had spawned with, Atilla decided it would be appropriate to team kill/team hurt us repeatedly. Admittedly, he did, once another 6e member had joined, use another cannon which I acknowledge, but this doesn't undo the inappropriate handling of the situation by him earlier. In the following round myself and a pubber were first to a static cannon on a different map and started to man it, along came Atilla and began to use it too, obviously thinking it was "his" again. Rather than teamkill as Atilla deems appropriate for such situations, I simply asked him why he thought it was his when we were the first to use it, I recieved a reply telling me I was a troll and to f**k off. The pubber, obviously annoyed, started to teamkill Atilla and for the temporary absence of Atilla, I prepared and aimed the cannon for my own use. Upon being about to fire, Atilla simply comes and teamkills me, and I'm met with a similar hostile response when I ask what the teamkill was for. All in all, I would have expected better from an officer of the 6e aswel as a long time member of the community who I'm sure is very aware of the rules with regards to teamkilling on public servers and despite the infancy of Napoleonic Wars, I don't think this sort of behaviour is appropriate at all.
Background:
Firstly, this was on the EU_2 server.
After playing a number of rounds with a couple of friends, I had absolutely no complaints. However, at the start of just another round, a friend and I went artillery, after several minutes a "6e_Art_Captain_Atilla" decided that the cannon we were using was "his cannon". After continuing to use the cannon, since it was infact the cannon we had spawned with, Atilla decided it would be appropriate to team kill/team hurt us repeatedly. Admittedly, he did, once another 6e member had joined, use another cannon which I acknowledge, but this doesn't undo the inappropriate handling of the situation by him earlier. In the following round myself and a pubber were first to a static cannon on a different map and started to man it, along came Atilla and began to use it too, obviously thinking it was "his" again. Rather than teamkill as Atilla deems appropriate for such situations, I simply asked him why he thought it was his when we were the first to use it, I recieved a reply telling me I was a troll and to f**k off. The pubber, obviously annoyed, started to teamkill Atilla and for the temporary absence of Atilla, I prepared and aimed the cannon for my own use. Upon being about to fire, Atilla simply comes and teamkills me, and I'm met with a similar hostile response when I ask what the teamkill was for. All in all, I would have expected better from an officer of the 6e aswel as a long time member of the community who I'm sure is very aware of the rules with regards to teamkilling on public servers and despite the infancy of Napoleonic Wars, I don't think this sort of behaviour is appropriate at all.
Atilla teamkilling myself and a friend after claiming our cannon was "his".
After killing a pubber, Atilla teamkilling me just after I had prepared the cannon and was about to fire in his absence.