Elenmmare said:
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger, eh? I can buy that. But what if it does kill you?
Nobody gets out of life alive. Like I said, what someone else chooses to do with their own body is none of my concern, they want to get themselves ****ed up on drugs, alcohol or a media studies degree that's their business. I don't stick my nose uninvited into their ****, the least I expect is the same in return.
Zaro said:
Perhaps you should consider that their preference does you no harm, while your preference harms them. Your comment is a perfect example of the mentality and selfishness of many smokers.
Bull****. Last time I checked there were several million square miles of territory and I take up less than 1% of that. If they're that upset by my smoking, they're free to stand somewhere else. Like I said, their driving ****s me up more than tobacco, in fact I can probably find any number of things they do which are detrimental to my health. Thing is, if someone near me is doing something I'm not happy with
I go stand somewhere else. If they don't have at least that level of intelligence, then the health risk from passive smoking is probably the least of their worries. Any one stupid enough to walk into a smoking bar and complain about the smoke is probably an ideal candidate for euthanasia in the first place.
pentagathus said:
And you can smoke when you have a drink, go outside.
It's illegal to consume alcohol in most city centres, and one could equally say if you don't want to be surrounded by smoke, go drink in the beer garden. Point is it should be up to the publican whether their premises are smoking, non-smoking or a mix of the two, not the law. If there's that much call for non-smoking bars then the market would soon sort it out without the need for Nanny State legislature.
Zaro said:
1. What about the people who work in those places? I did some bar work, and it could be horrible at times and probably took at least a year off of me. You could simply say "Well don't work there", but I didn't have a choice. You take what you can get, and that was the bar job I was able to get at the time. Why should bar staff have to put up with your habit?
If you don't like some aspect of your job then yes, you get another one, or (crazy idea I know) you don't accept the job in the first place. Don't give me bull**** about not having a choice; unless you're in some funky dictatorship which has locked you into the bar tender caste then you can always find another job. If you don't want to be shot at you don't join the military, if you don't want to see your **** on television you don't go into the porn industry. Don't want people smoking around you, don't get a job in a smoking premises. It's not like bar work is a highly skilled trade
Pharaoh Llandy said:
And when I have to step into a lift (elevator to you Americans) full of people who have just got off their fag break at work and they absolutely reek of smoke. Then they douse themselves with perfume because they KNOW they reek, and that makes it even worse, because you're trapped in a small space with no proper ventilation and a toxic cloud of half a dozen perfumes. And even then, you can STILL smell the smoke.
I'm allergic to several chemicals commonly used in perfumes, deodorants and similar scents, but I don't go around demanding people stop wearing it. I'm allergic to grass pollen too, but I don't insist the council consult me before cutting the grass outside my home. See, in these cases it's
my problem, and therefore
my responsibility to deal with.