Let me summarize the situation.
The Kurgan culture is undeniably Turkic. And nothing we say can change this fact. The Kurgan culture started its westwards migration at around 4000BC. The Indo-Europeans first started their eastwards migration at around 2000BC. The Kurgan culture's signature was the horse while the Indo-European peoples' signature was farming at first. If you are going to support one theory, you can not support other contradicting theories like how many people like to do nowadays (since it supports their illogical world view). To make things simple, I can not at the same time go teach English in India and go surfing in Atlantic at the same time. That is a contradiction. (although there are theories about omnipresence so we should refrain from reaching to conclusions. There is a possibility for an advanced form of Indo-European people to be at two different places and situations to exist)
The mixing of Uralic and Turkic people lead to the "Ogur" Turks.
So... First know that there is a theory pointing to the illogical steps followed by the theory about Kurgans belong to Indo-European speaking people thus once again returning kurgans to their real owners Turks. The theory about kurgans belong to Indo-Europeans is a huge fiasco and it was not successful to hide the turth.
Also, even if the Etruscan people turn out to be not Turkic (Ogur) despite extensive amount of linguistic, cultural and mythology parallels, it is certain that they had extremely close ties with Turkic people though the Tur (Trojans) and the Proto-Tigris (Sumeria between them). If someone had the knowledge about Kurgan burial he is either a Turk or someone who had very close ties with Turks since noone would be allowed to participate a Kurgan burial. That is not something that can be attended by public.
The Kurgan culture is undeniably Turkic. And nothing we say can change this fact. The Kurgan culture started its westwards migration at around 4000BC. The Indo-Europeans first started their eastwards migration at around 2000BC. The Kurgan culture's signature was the horse while the Indo-European peoples' signature was farming at first. If you are going to support one theory, you can not support other contradicting theories like how many people like to do nowadays (since it supports their illogical world view). To make things simple, I can not at the same time go teach English in India and go surfing in Atlantic at the same time. That is a contradiction. (although there are theories about omnipresence so we should refrain from reaching to conclusions. There is a possibility for an advanced form of Indo-European people to be at two different places and situations to exist)
The Paleolithic Continuity hypothesis reverses the Kurgan hypothesis and largely identifies the Indo-Europeans with Gimbutas's "Old Europe."[8] PCT reassigns the Kurgan culture (traditionally considered early Indo-European) to a people of predominantly mixed Uralic and Turkic stock. Alinei argues that the use of borrowed Turkic words in horse terminology, such as qaptï ("to grab with hands and teeth"), yabu ("horse"), yam ("nomadic caravan-tent"), yuntă ("horse" (generic)), aygur ("stallion"), homut ("horse collar") and alaša ("pack horse"), in Samoyedic (Northern and Southern), in some Finno-Ugric languages and Slavic languages, "proves the antiquity of Turkic presence in the European area bordering Asia". He suggests that horse domestication originated with Turkic peoples, offering this as an explanation why horse terminology in the European area bordering Asia and in most of Eastern Europe is rooted in Turkic and not Indo-European vocabulary.[9] He supports this hypothesis by making a tentative linguistic identification of Etruscans as a Uralic, proto-Hungarian people that had already undergone strong proto-Turkic influence in the third millennium BC,[7] when Pontic invasions would have brought this people to the Carpathian Basin. A subsequent migration of Urnfield culture signature around 1250 BC is said to have caused this ethnic group to expand south in a general movement of people. This is equated with the upheaval of the Sea Peoples and the overthrow of an earlier Italic substrate at the onset of the "Etruscan" Villanovan culture.[7]
The mixing of Uralic and Turkic people lead to the "Ogur" Turks.
So... First know that there is a theory pointing to the illogical steps followed by the theory about Kurgans belong to Indo-European speaking people thus once again returning kurgans to their real owners Turks. The theory about kurgans belong to Indo-Europeans is a huge fiasco and it was not successful to hide the turth.
Also, even if the Etruscan people turn out to be not Turkic (Ogur) despite extensive amount of linguistic, cultural and mythology parallels, it is certain that they had extremely close ties with Turkic people though the Tur (Trojans) and the Proto-Tigris (Sumeria between them). If someone had the knowledge about Kurgan burial he is either a Turk or someone who had very close ties with Turks since noone would be allowed to participate a Kurgan burial. That is not something that can be attended by public.