I'm entirely aware of that, we've had our share of bailouts in Portugal and it honestly gets quite old. With that mentality, banks won't ever have real accountability for being managed extremely irresponsibly, because they can always just expect a bailout when it goes bad and it's the taxpayer that pays for them doing a ****ty job, just so they don't lose their money in the bank... It's a ****ty precedent for it to be the norm and it would be good to start putting a scare into them, even if it harms customers. Otherwise it keeps happening and there's no incentive to function like a real company as you're pretty much guaranteed to be saved. The concept of a bailout IS pretty ridiculous, noone else gets a restart button.kurczak said:Yeah, but a bank this large is not island unto itself. If you just let it collapse as a punishment, it's like ripping out an unhealthy organ out of the body as a "punishment". Maybe sometimes it is necessary, but it should be the last resort with contingency plans, not a "meh whatever, **** it" go-to response.
I would rather see it nationalized than go bankrupt.