Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
I'm still waiting on an explanation to why the bottom of tier 2 is against 4 Tier 1s whilst the best team is against more tier 2s and 3s.
Looks like the top tier teams have the most easy schedule. This is if you were to place every team under a number. Sigi's team is effectively 2 top tier teams behind.
Looks like the top tier teams have the most easy schedule. This is if you were to place every team under a number. Sigi's team is effectively 2 top tier teams behind.
Fietta, I'm going to assume the best case scenario and assume that you missed my response to you.
https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,360425.msg8679619.html#msg8679619
As for your newest post, you just made up a bunch of numbers and complained about what your made up numbers said. My numbers were pulled from representatives of the different teams. You simply made stuff up and complained.
Note: Stronger teams are going to have easier schedules than weaker teams. It is just the way the math works. This is because a team cannot face itself, so in the case of a bad team, there is one less bad team to face. Likewise, strong teams have a smaller pool of strong teams to face since they can't face themselves.
The only teams with any abnormalities are sigi, trox, and maccle. Maccle and trox have slightly harder schedules than they should, while sigi has an easier schedule than he should. While I can look into minor schedule adjustments, there is no evidence to suggest problems with the other teams matchups.
https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,360425.msg8679619.html#msg8679619
As for your newest post, you just made up a bunch of numbers and complained about what your made up numbers said. My numbers were pulled from representatives of the different teams. You simply made stuff up and complained.
Note: Stronger teams are going to have easier schedules than weaker teams. It is just the way the math works. This is because a team cannot face itself, so in the case of a bad team, there is one less bad team to face. Likewise, strong teams have a smaller pool of strong teams to face since they can't face themselves.
The only teams with any abnormalities are sigi, trox, and maccle. Maccle and trox have slightly harder schedules than they should, while sigi has an easier schedule than he should. While I can look into minor schedule adjustments, there is no evidence to suggest problems with the other teams matchups.
I gave them a number, which starts from 10 to 2. The data was in a list from best to worst so I decided to replace that with a number for each team. Even if I used different numbers for them, the result would be the same.
You ranked the teams differently than the representatives from each team did. Thus your data is off.Fietta said:
Why though? The cumulative is more representative data. Besides, it is also what was used in the creation of the schedule.MrNevino1 said:
For those who are curious, here are the actual SoS numbers as they relate to the schedule:
Note that "SoS Intended" takes into account that teams cannot play themselves. A difference of .375 or below is considered acceptable to the admin team. As this is not the case with all teams, some small adjustments will be made to the schedule to create more parity. The adjusted schedule should be available this evening but no promises.
In any case, week 1 matches should be unaffected by this change.
Note that "SoS Intended" takes into account that teams cannot play themselves. A difference of .375 or below is considered acceptable to the admin team. As this is not the case with all teams, some small adjustments will be made to the schedule to create more parity. The adjusted schedule should be available this evening but no promises.
In any case, week 1 matches should be unaffected by this change.
This still doesn't answer the question of why?
Why even bother with these divisions, it will clearly make some teams have easier runs than others. Even if the rankings are right... which they won't be, cause who knows how the teams will perform.
If you're changing the schedule anyway, what is the reason against not doing a round robin?
Why even bother with these divisions, it will clearly make some teams have easier runs than others. Even if the rankings are right... which they won't be, cause who knows how the teams will perform.
If you're changing the schedule anyway, what is the reason against not doing a round robin?
findecanno
Grandmaster Knight
Despite being a west knight, I'm actually east coast.Roberta_Baratheon said:
I liked the first round, apart from all the jav cav
i'd be confused if i lived in germany and was put in east europe 
Ebdanian Admiral
You can still have divisions and division games can still count more than other matches, but you should still only play each team from your division once. I feel like this is the best compromise without completely scratching the division system.
I think you made a mistake on the Schedules section of the website, it has some teams playing other teams twice and not playing others at all! Must be a mistake because of how gob-smackingly idiotic it would be to set it up like that. Good thing I caught it because it would be pretty embarrassing if we actually played anything other than a round robin for Super Scramble League.
No need to thank me, just get it fixed asap.
No need to thank me, just get it fixed asap.
Kragen said:Remove me from turnament
Kragen has decided to stay on, whoever his captain is.
Also were down to just these players if you can help find a state or province.
Zacty, Nigerian, Easter Cow, Natebesosavage, Hayden, Killershark, Predurrer, Tymo, Rhine, Forsaken, Alexson, Arthennos, Exmarius, Geoffrey, Harx, Mantis, Milky, Slowbro, Tony Vordiac, Vandahl
- Status
