Native Completed Warband Fantasy League (Player Rankings Added)

Users who are viewing this thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
MrNevino1 said:
Anyone is welcome to leave if they don't like it.

You are welcome not to respond if all you will be saying is "leave if they don't like"

We know that you'd love to see that in the case of a few of us, but I'm quite sure everyone in this tournament knows that they are welcome to leave if they don't like it, it's quite common knowledge about any tournament in any game.

Now please, you just got a good admin team, and a fair head admin, no need to be unprofessional and continue the trend from before. A suggestion that you are welcome to look at would be to get ALL the admin messages, including short ones like this that potentially can cause drama, on this thread to be moderated by the head admin, or the group in general if it's not too much work. Most of the drama up until this point is caused by this kind of behavior by the previous team and knee-jerk reactions. At this point, let's give a break to arguing and dissing each other every time there is an opportunity and move forwards and just enjoy the game.

Again, thanks for coming to a good conclusion and rebooting the tourney with a much better and experienced admin team and a re-draft. Hoping to see this kind of constructive and well decision making, that isn't hindered by personal motifs moving forwards, we as the players appreciate it.
 
Please post a list of the players you are removing so the captains can verify if they are active or not thx
 
WNedjh5.png
 
There are 145 players and 8 teams. It'll be 17-18 per team, but as man you of us know it everyone will be active at all times. If we increase total we run the risk of teams not being able to scrim regularly.
 
So the problem we have is that there are about 145 players left in the pool that we have deemed active. It is reasonable to expect to lose about 20 players from this. Given these numbers the teams will average 15-16 players. If you add a ninth team then you are looking at 13-14 players per team. This is a small amount for a team of players that know each other in a regular tournament, let alone a team of players that do not know each other and maybe lose interest over time.

I would say 15-16 is more than reasonable team sizes.
 
Roberta_Baratheon said:
So the problem we have is that there are about 145 players left in the pool that we have deemed active. It is reasonable to expect to lose about 20 players from this. Given these numbers the teams will average 15-16 players. If you add a ninth team then you are looking at 13-14 players per team. This is a small amount for a team of players that know each other in a regular tournament, let alone a team of players that do not know each other and maybe lose interest over time.

I would say 15-16 is more than reasonable team sizes.
Except that so far we've only lost 4 players.
 
maccle said:
Roberta_Baratheon said:
So the problem we have is that there are about 145 players left in the pool that we have deemed active. It is reasonable to expect to lose about 20 players from this. Given these numbers the teams will average 15-16 players. If you add a ninth team then you are looking at 13-14 players per team. This is a small amount for a team of players that know each other in a regular tournament, let alone a team of players that do not know each other and maybe lose interest over time.

I would say 15-16 is more than reasonable team sizes.
Except that so far we've only lost 4 players.

We went from 180 to 145 since Week One. Don't speak on matters you arn't informed of dumb kid Maccle :party:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom