Bolkonsky said:It's not like starcraft is a profession or anything.
Because I clearly shouldn't be allowed to modify files on my own hard drive.Austupaio said:There are no in-game cheats, that's the thing, Blizzard banned people who modified DLLs and the executable.
That's because WoW quite sensibly doesn't have anything on the client machine you can hack to do that. Presumably SCII does, in which case it's Blizzard's incompetence which is the problem, not people cheating.Pjoo said:It might be in a single player game, but they are hacking to affect the online parts and other players of the game. There would be no argument if this happened in WoW and people hacked them some of the achievements with rare special titles and mounts, with no gameplay effects.
Austupaio said:Are they not? I figured they were considering how easy they are to find for pretty much any game before you buy it. On the other hand, even if a EULA isn't legally binding, they carry a lot of weight in American courts. Just like most contracts that have no real legal basis, American Judges will usually give people, or companies, a lot of leeway if a signed piece of paper is in their favour.
Uhm... What?Archonsod said:That's because WoW quite sensibly doesn't have anything on the client machine you can hack to do that. Presumably SCII does, in which case it's Blizzard's incompetence which is the problem, not people cheating.Pjoo said:It might be in a single player game, but they are hacking to affect the online parts and other players of the game. There would be no argument if this happened in WoW and people hacked them some of the achievements with rare special titles and mounts, with no gameplay effects.
Austupaio said:You know, they gave a public warning some months prior to the banning that they were about start; yet people kept cheating.
Why would you defend the idiots?
It's not hacking. The trainers edit memory addresses. The question is what kind of muppet allows for an exploit that was once popular. In the seventies.Pjoo said:Because Blizzard's game allows for hacking, that means it's their fault people are doing it?
Bolkonsky said:
I'm not defending the cheaters, I'm protesting the whole situation.
The best of both worlds is people can cheat, they just disable their achievements.
Blizzard has gone waaaaaay over the top here.
There are in-game cheats. You type them into the chat bar.Austupaio said:There are no in-game cheats, that's the thing, Blizzard banned people who modified DLLs and the executable.
Then they should include the option for it not to. There are quite a few people who couldn't care less about achievements or multiplayer.Pjoo said:It might be in a single player game, but they are hacking to affect the online parts and other players of the game.
Does that prevent you from going on to the next mission?Austupaio said:Those cheats don't count for anything though. As soon as you lose them, the mission doesn't even count as having been played.
As in, they should let people use hacks without it affecting the online aspects of the game.Austupaio said:What do you mean have an option for it not to?