Colonel Greed said:
But as I see it the only fair way would be for the administration to determine who would play the best. Ofcourse for that to happen,every match would have to be on video,which causes even more problems.
Not sure how well we could add statistics ect other than k/d ratio. I could definitly be wrong on that though.
The other problem is that, as of now, the administration is essentially me.
... and I don't much fancy the unpopularity that sort of responsibility would guarantee me (the proposed ruleset is putting me on thin ice as it is
).
There probably is a creative way of using the scoreboards without simply giving it to the player with the best K/D. Some sort of points system whereby players get given points for certain things e.g.:
2 points for being on the winning team overall
3 points for having the least deaths overall (must have played all rounds)
2 " " " " second least deaths overall ( " " " " ")
1 point " " " third least deaths overall ( " " " " ")
2 points for getting 22-26 kills
3 points for getting 27-31 kills
5 points for getting 32+ kills
I'm sure you could find more and maybe the numbers need tweaking but you get the idea.
EDIT: Might be a bit unbalanced to do least deaths and winning team... maybe keep points for the winning team but do the least deaths for each team separately.