Mykami said:
U obliviously donut now inkleash.
You, kind sir, should stick to your fantastic drawings, because your writing is
appallingly atrocious, erroneous and erratic.*
*Yes, it's Google translate, not me.
NikeBG said:
DrevniDabar said:
For instance, they say that 14th century Balkans lands mostly had wooden castles.
Wow, really?!
Oh, man, you see, that's why I would never really trust a Western historian trying to speak about Eastern European history.
Well, their info on that matter seems to have its roots from a document, which some French chronicler/adventurer (whos name I forgot) has written for a Pope (either Clement or Innocent), in the mid 14th century.
Now, he says of Balkans (he travelled over Serbia, Bulgaria, and RE, to get to Constantinople) that it is a land where people are not good, where castles are simple wooden ramparts, where nobility doesn't look much different than peasants, and that, worst of all, people there are Orthodox Christians.
But, for land itself, he says that it is beautiful and fertile, full of pretty forests, great rivers full of fish, then the endless pastures and so on, and so on...
Now, I deciphered a true meaning of that letter:
The land is beutiful, but the people there do not deserve that beauty. They should be conquered...