Rigadoon said:
Harry_ said:
the trenches aren't constructed very well. they usually have shelves where a lot of supplies were kept (and should generally be scattered with building supplies and equipment and helmets and things)
the sides would generally be sloped, not flat. It's more efficient to dig them that way.
And duckboards were really important. The way these current trenches are, the soldiers would be knee deep in mud after one day and unable to move properly, getting diseases, etc.
The firestep and parapet are extremely important for the trenches to be an adequate defensive position. The way they are now, it's impossible to move around the trench without exposing yourself to fire (unless this mod allows crouch-movement, though that would be slow and not historical)
to explain what i mean,
-Trenches with duckboards are in
-The trenches are taller than people and we're planning to extend it to be even taller
-Firesteps are in
-We have sandbags that are meant to be placed at the top of trenches to act like parapets
-I've seen plenty of trench pictures that are flat. If it's that big of a deal it would be simple to fix
-Things scattered about the trench is the mappers job to lay down
-I've never seen a trench with shelves before. If there were, I don't see how that means our trenches are poorly constructed because obviously there were trenches without shelves as well
i was talking to the mappers, mostly. But trench modules with built in firesteps would be pretty useful. (that way the mappers dont have to trial-and-error to find the right height that an infantryman can easilly "step-up" but still see and fire over the trench comfortably.
if you've seen photos with no shelves or areas for stowage you were probably looking at connecting trenches not intended for firing in. Ones running parallel to the line of advance would obviously not be used as firing positions, and would have no provisions for firing. The construction was not always exactly the same, but usually followed the same basic pattern.
the only reason i could think of for you having seen many trenches with flat sides would be those which have been partially destroyed and hastilly reconstructed just by digging. Almost any photo you can see in which the trench has been retained by woodwork, the construction "cross section" is the same - because you can't fire effectively from it otherwhise.
there were also different layouts for dry soil and wet soil - and different stages in construction for each. In dry soil, first they would dig single-file trenches with fairly straight sides, then broaden the top, add provisions for firing, and finish the walls. In wet ground the early stage would have an angled floor to catch water, then being replaced by the traditional layout with duckboards.
Most the time you can see trenches with no shelves and firesteps, they are quickly dug out earthen things which look like they were dug with a shell rather than a shovel. that's the first stage. You could build those but it doesn't make much sense to show them with breastwork.
The traverse trenches (those running parallel to the line of fire - including those in the "square zig zag" pattern on the frontline trenches) would usually not have firing positions either.
here are some examples from different sides of the conflict, so it can be expected they were not taught by the same school. The materials are different but the shape is the same. The "elbow rest" would often be used as a shelf if it was low enough - they would also sometimes have shelves behind the shooters for their belongings. The point is they didnt just throw them into the bottom of the trench to get rained on.
As for the angled sides - i suppose they wouldnt be totally necessary but it seems obvious that the fastest way to dig a trench would be not to dig any more than you need to - legs need a lot less room than torsos holding rifles.
if all those things are included as you said, the mappers then, aren't using them in a way which makes sense. Even if the BRFs have all these features, it wont mean anything to the mod if mappers dont use them