TheBoberton said:[* The exception to this was the Guards, Rifles, and a few Foot regiments]
DarkOmega said:This thread would be very useful stuck on the regimental thread.
TheBoberton said:Some corrections pertaining to the British line regiment ranks:
First off, due to a technicality Colonel shouldn't be on the list. A Lieutenant Colonel would command a battalion, and given that most regiments fielded only a single battalion*, this made him the senior field officer in the regiment.
Also, British line infantry regiments did not have the rank of Second Lieutenant until the 1870s. Another thing, the British rifle regiments never fielded Ensigns, as the rank of Second Lieutenant took the Ensign's duties, and made it obsolete.
In my research, I've yet to find any mention of any Sergeant Major, other than the Regimental one.
In the line infantry, Lance Corporal did not exist during the Napoleonic Wars, and only the rifles used the appointment of Chosen Man.
[* The exception to this was the Guards, Rifles, and a few Foot regiments]
In short, the ranks of a battalion would be thus: (Note: I'm not going to put in appointments like the 'rank' of Adjutant. Someone who knows more on that could correct me.)
Field Officers:
Lieutenant Colonel - Commanded the battalion
Major - 2, each commanded a wing of the battalion
Junior Officers:
Captain
Lieutenant
Ensign
Non-Commissioned Officers:
Regimental Sergeant Major
Colour Sergeant
Sergeant
Corporal
Enlisted:
Private
Kator Viridian said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Colborne,_1st_Baron_Seaton
I beleive at the time Colborne was up to the rank if not passed Colonel and personally lead the 52nd at the battle of waterloo, considering he made it up to Major General by 1825 without buying any of his ranks I'd presume that to be the case.
"Go on Colborne, they won't stand!"
TheBoberton said:Kator Viridian said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Colborne,_1st_Baron_Seaton
I beleive at the time Colborne was up to the rank if not passed Colonel and personally lead the 52nd at the battle of waterloo, considering he made it up to Major General by 1825 without buying any of his ranks I'd presume that to be the case.
"Go on Colborne, they won't stand!"
There were exceptions to what I said, but generally it was a Lieutenant Colonel who lead a battalion in battle. Although, thank you for pointing out one of the exceptions to the general rule, I do enjoy learning more about the history of the era. It might be good to make a note in the rank list that if a regiment had one, they wouldn't have the other.
Bluehawk said:When you say they only fielded one battalion, do you mean the British kept a second battalion on British soil in reserve, or were there many regiments that only were only comprised of one battalion?
I would've expected British ranks to be the simplest for this community to sort out.
Bluehawk said:When you say they only fielded one battalion, do you mean the British kept a second battalion on British soil in reserve, or were there many regiments that only were only comprised of one battalion?
I would've expected British ranks to be the simplest for this community to sort out.
MatLae said:For the french ranks it's not Chef du Bataillon but Chef de Bataillon.
Also, Chef du Eskadron spells Chef d'Escadron
The french cavalry private rank is cavalier, not "chevalier" which means "knight", and adjutant spells adjudant in french